| Saving resources is the fundamental policy of protecting the environment. The 18 th Party Congress made specific arrangements to promote resource conservation, indicating the main direction of a comprehensive resource conservation promoting and its fundamental areas, and Put forward priorities of a comprehensive resource conservation promoting. Developing circular economy is an effective form and important way to save resources. Government plays an important role in developing circular economy, it has become a urgent problems to majorization and adjust the non-standard methods and ways about the recovery of and remanufacturing existing waste electrical and electronic products in our country. The traditional supply chain can`t meet the requirements of resource-saving society. It should change to a Closed-Loop Supply Chain. Government has become a key figure to coordinate and guide the Closed-Loop Supply Chain.In order to study models of two-period Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Premium and Penalty Mechanism and its income distribution, this thesis uses operations research, game theory and optimization theory, etc. At first, the thesis established basic models of a two-period Closed-Loop Supply Chain with and without Premium and Penalty Mechanism, and got following conclusions by model comparison: A reasonable mechanism can improve recoveries of the supply chain and the proceeds of the members effectively, also can reduce the price of the first period and the second period. Reasonable parameters relationship of Premium and Penalty Mechanism is given in the thesis. Second, two income distribution models are designed According to the contradiction between the object and the subject of Premium and Penalty Mechanism. One is the two-period Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Cost and Revenue Sharing Contract, the other is two-period Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Responsibility sharing. Both income distribution model is effective by comparing these two models and the basic model. Not only can improve the recovery rate and reduce price s more efficient, but also increase more revenue of the members. The best choice is the model with Cost and Revenue Sharing Contract when the Premium and Penalty intensity is not very high. Instead, the government needs to consider the environmental benefits, consumer benefits and loop supply chain efficiency to make specific decisions. Finally, add willingness to pay in the above model, the model with Cost and Revenue Sharing Contract would increase the price and is not the best choice through the model simulation analysis under willingness to pay. |
