| With the further development of sustainable development and globalization, taking the Corporate Social Responsibility as the logic origin, to solve social problem that including environmental and social issues is a request responded to Sustainable development, which starting the trends of pursuing sustainable competitiveness. In nowadays risk society, to improve the level of public security governance, public safety as an outstanding social issue is gradually participate in the course of public policy legislation in the form of the new commercial mode which birthed from its physical form. The commercial mode is mainly for safe production Ensuring, social insecurity defusing and crisis responding. This supplies a point of penetration for the public security governance. Now, as a partner of public-private partnership, the corporate is heuristically participating in this social work for governance improving.However, subject to the contradiction of obligation and performance, the corporate regards the investment of public security as an obligation for a long time. In addition to the legal responsibility which ensure the safety of production and consumption, enterprises response to other social responsibility requirements through the means of philanthropy. In the long run, this charitable behavior will intensify the intension between obligation and performance. Therefore, under the concepts of risk governance and sustainable competence and performance, this article researches on the public security investment in the framework of Corporate Social Responsibility. The main purpose is to explore de-philanthropy investing contracts, ultimately improving the inefficient situation of public security governance.Firstly, the article applies the concept of Risk governance to redefine the concept of public security, then define the research object that is public security items corresponding to the corporate social responsibility practice. The public security items are divided into three categories, which are the project of safety production, the prevention project of public security and incident handling support projects. The first two projects are corresponding to the preventive management, the last one is corresponding to the emergency measure.Secondly, basing on the practice of public security governance in statistical caliber, discusses the investment ideas of public security items on the perspective of government and enterprise through the theoretical analysis method. We can draw some conclusions, which the purpose of government is mainly hoping to improve the level of public security governance in the way of CSR, and the key means that can make enterprises actively participated is the rational choice of de-philanthropy investment strategy.Then, through the theoretical analysis method, analysis the factors which influence the investing decisions of corporate. At the same time, further analyses the influence process which make the decision behavior turn into the corporate value, building the dynamic two-staged model which shows the transformation process.Finally, under the framework of public-private partnership, basing on the corporate investment practice and the influence factors towards to public security items, quantitatively analysis the decision making of corporate under two different public policy selections, which are regulatory policy and administrative incentives. For these, we can draw such conclusions that a policy regulation only may make public security items in short supply and the legal liability for safety production can’t be in guaranteed. More, an administrative incentive only may lead to a paradox of administrative incentives, making enterprises may be keen on the prevention project of public security and incident handling support projects which can bring profit, resulting that enterprise will ignore the legal liability for safety production. Therefore, in the last part of the article, the improvements of profit are given, making the project of safety production as the premise of investments in the regulatory policy, which is called the bottom responsibility of corporate. And the same time, the government uses the administrative incentives policy to improve the motivation of corporate investments in the prevention project of public security and incident handling support projects. Finally, apply the principal-agent model to design an incentive contract which sets not only rewards but punishments, and then solve the optimal contract, concluding the public policy advice towards to public security governance. |
