The Research Of Public Opinion And Judicatory

With the rapid development of Internet and other high-tech means of communication,obtain information is more convenient, more and more frequent interaction, has come the eraof globalization sharing of information resources. Under the influence of this background,public opinion is also showing a new trend, had a huge impact on the trial court cases, alandmark case speak for themselves. How deal with the relationship between justice andpublic opinion, became a major problem facing academia and the judiciary, in terms ofpractice or in theory be solved.This article is divided into four parts:The first is to clarify the concepts and features of the public opinion. The conceptual partof the first section of public opinion, the author investigated from the speech source, amongscholars and authoritative book opinion the meaning of the definition, then introduced thecurrent development of public opinion and the use of different disciplines a last specific to thefield of law its analysis. Section II summarizes the characteristics presented by the publicopinion.The second chapter analyzes the impact of public opinion on justice. The contents of thefirst section of public opinion on the administration of justice and affect the way of justice, theimpact of the public administration of justice, including filing, trial and execution stage,mainly through the people’s jury system, the supervision of the NPC and its StandingCommittee, the media and the Internet and other forms of expression, the network of publicopinion is the current society is the most popular, the most important expression of publicopinion the way. Section III described the positive and negative impacts of the publicadministration of justice, and reveal the two sides of the public opinion. Section IV carried outa detailed analysis of public opinion to intervene in judicial reasons.The third chapter is the response of the judicial opinion, described the judicial cautiouson public opinion and tolerance from two aspects. The first section to start from the moredeveloped countries of the foreign several judicial system, a detailed description of the judiciary be treated with caution the form of two systems of public opinion. Section II putJapan and China as examples to illustrate the justice of public opinion tolerant side.The fourth chapter is to improve the public opinion and judicial relations countermeasures.Section I advocate the public respect for judicial authority, and more effort as far as possiblein the Legislative link. The second section is the protection of the rights of the regulation, topromote comprehensive protection for the media freedom of expression should also developappropriate regulatory measures to prevent the judiciary is under the influence of adversereports. Section3showed that the judicial opinion should be carefully screened to absorb thereasonable content of public opinion, rejected the irrational content. The fourth quarter toimprove the public opinion into the judicial path, including to improve the existing jurysystem, and opinion on this basis to create a new absorption channels, the interaction betweenpublic opinion and justice took institutionalized track.