On Network Public Opinion And Judicial Trial

Nowadays,with the rise of Weibo,the extraordinary dominance of domestic public opinion at the media from the media revolution that broke out on the issue of public scrutiny and plot destruction of the human skeleton has been at a glance.Therefore,it is an indisputable fact that it is an objective phenomenon that public opinion affects the judicial administration and cannot be denied.However,the crux of the issue lies not in whether public opinion affects the judiciary,but rather in how it affects the judiciary,to what extent it can affect the judiciary,and how the judiciary should make its choice in a public opinion environment.Based on the analysis of the "Li Changkui Case" and the "Yu Huan Case",the article reproduces the vicious conflicts and positive interactions between public opinion and the judiciary in China.It thoroughly studies the characteristics of public opinion in China and how public opinion can be applied to public opinion.Judicial trials have an impact,in order to achieve a harmonious solution to the conflicting relationship between the two in the new media environment,and maintain a balance between public opinion and justice.This article is divided into four chapters.The first chapter mainly analyzes and introduces the phenomenon of public opinion trial in the "Li Changkui Case" of hot cases.Starting from reviewing the case,we analyze the propensity of media reports during the process of case trials and the characteristics of judicial trials under public opinion,and introduce the conflicts and performance between the judiciary and public opinion.The second chapter,through the introduction and preparation of the previous chapter,leads to the problem that the chapter says it wants to solve: How can public opinion influence the judicial process? In other words,public opinion is the channel or method through which the choice and whereabouts of the judiciary are controlled.The third chapter,starting from the "Yu Huan case," shows that the present judicial system is not "preserved" by public opinion.On the contrary,by rationallyresponding and guiding each other between them,it can eventually reach a state of positive interaction.In the third section,it is described that under the guidance of the official,the detonation of the public opinion field can be quickly and effectively attributed to calm.In the fourth chapter,under the previous analysis of the two cases,the author continues to discuss the coexistence model between public opinion and the judiciary,starting with the public opinion and the judiciary respectively,and proposing that the rational judicial response to public opinion pressure in order to adjust the public opinion in China and The road to judicial relations.