Effects Of Self-correlation And Framing Effect In A Negative Mood On Crisis Decision Making

As an important psychological state, crisis decision-making can form many different conclusions in the whole resource collection.. In China’s rapid economic development today, naturally, society has characteristics of crisis events is increasing, such as 97 Asian financial crisis, the 2001 September 11 terrorist hijacking attacks,03 years swept the atypical pneumonia in 2008, many provinces and cities in southern snow disaster,2009 Guizhou wengan.it group events,11 years of Japan’s Fukushima 9.0 Earthquake nuclear power plant accident,12 years due to the Diaoyu Islands events caused by the boycott of Japanese goods and then cause the vandalism burning action events, and so on, to our managers at all levels and social self brings the new challenge, namely, how to efficient and perfect solve such crises. The research crisis decision-making principle and the solution has the important practical significance. Crisis decision-making mainly refers to the decision-makers in decision-making is relatively short, the shortage of resources and the role of many kinds of negative conditions of the existence of the crisis have a comprehensive rapid response and behavioral processes, this is the ability to have more of the influence of uncertainty and high risk also contains information content is low, the asymmetric information and decision time short.The mood for the decision effect is an indisputable fact, which has been proved by many scholars, from the current point of view, starting from the angle of theory of decision making research on the impact of emotion, has been very common, but for the type of emotions as variables to study is less, especially the emotional effects of different performance the decision will give the award from Nobel in 2002 Kahneman and Tversky after put forward the corresponding theory, domestic and foreign scholars have analyzed the specific research, and on the basis of the actual situation, the formation of a certain theoretical level and political effect. Although many scholars at home and abroad on the effect of the specific implementation of the research framework. The overall effect is not very ideal. Many scholars in the related research methods used for the study of psychology, emotional control and framing effect has certain research results. But the specific situation mode of the crisis decision-making, research on self correlation will be accompanied by the risk decision with a similar situation? The specific types of decisions will affect the crisis decision? Individual decision making situation and crisis public crisis decision-making situation also is a factor of crisis decision making?The study follows the risk decision model, drawing on emotional questionnaire of Liu Yongfang et al. Study using Watson to prepare the implementation of target emotion control, self decision in crisis material basis, explore the impact of different treatment, self correlation and framework of decision types in the emotion of crisis decision making.The results show that:(1)The main effect of emotion and self correlation is significant, the interaction of the two is not significant. From the comparison of the situation, from the experimental results, the influence of different decisions, emotional control, negative emotions are greater for the crisis decision-making influence, risk, risk factor in the decision-making in the larger, more risk in crisis decision-making; high degree of self related subjects than low self correlation subjects crisis decision propensity score higher, with greater risks in the decision-making process.(2) the overall effect, emotion and character of the framework is relatively significant, but there was no significant interaction between the two. If further research is knowable, neutral mood subjects than negative emotion subjects in crisis decision on score lower, that is to say the negative emotion of subjects in crisis decision-making more inclined to risk; loss under the framework of the subjects than the benefit under the framework of the subjects the crisis in the decision of the higher scores, the crisis decision-making more risk.(3) the interaction of self correlation and framework of task interaction significantly, self correlation and crisis decision type is significant, the interaction of the three is not significant. In the context of low self correlation under the loss frame subjects under the frame than the gain was more adventure in crisis; in the context of high self correlation, the subjects face individual event decision making than facing public events tend to risk seeking decision.