Clinical Studies Tendon Orthopedic Treatment Of Knee Osteoarthritis

Objective: By observing tendon bonesetting the early, mid-blood stasissyndrome of knee osteoarthritis HSS score improvement, objective evaluation of itsclinical efficacy, provide a theoretical basis for clinical application.Methods: The cases in strict accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria tocollect60cases of knee osteoarthritis were randomly divided into treatment group andcontrol group,30cases in each. The treatment group received orthopedic treatmentof tendon, the control group received traditional massage therapy treatment. Twogroups of patients were treated for one month. All patients before treatment, after theHSS score, and related data for statistical analysis.Results：Treatment group2cases plus another drug adjuvant therapy, two casesof waiver of this therapy, one case of lost, one case of knee pain worsened aftertreatment discontinuation of treatment, a total of24patients completed the study; thecontrol group lost two cases,3cases plus another drug adjuvant therapy, one case ofa waiver of this therapy, one case of lost of23patients completed the study.Statistical analysis is as follows:(1)Before treatment: General information two groups of patients, HSS scoretotal score, HSS score in pain, function, range of motion, muscle strength, flexiondeformity, stability integral comparison, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).(2)HSS score total score comparison: After treatment, HSS score total scorecompared with before treatment were significantly different (P <0.05), respectively.After treatment, there were significant differences HSS score (P <0.05) total score,the treatment group than the control group.(3)HSS score in pain score comparison: After treatment with pre-treatment painscores were significantly different (P <0.05), respectively. There are differences (P<0.05) After treatment pain scores, the treatment group than the control group.(4) HSS score features integral comparison: After treatment, the integral function before treatment were significantly different (P <0.05), respectively. There aredifferences (P <0.05) after treatment groups function points in the treatment groupthan the control group.(5) HSS activity score points comparison: After treatment, there were significantdifferences (P <0.05) the activities of the two groups of patients before integration andtreatment. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) after treatment, both groupsfunction points.(6) HSS score points in muscle strength comparison: integration and musclegroups before treatment showed no difference (P>0.05), respectively, after treatment.After treatment, muscle comparison points, the difference was not statisticallysignificant (P>0.05).(7) HSS score points in joint deformity comparison: two joint deformity pointsafter treatment showed no significant difference (P>0.05), respectively, beforetreatment. Two joint deformity points after treatment, the difference was notstatistically significant (P>0.05).(8) HSS score points in joint stability comparison: After treatment, joint stabilitypoints compared with before treatment were significantly different (P <0.05),respectively. There are differences (P <0.05) After treatment of joint stability pointsin the treatment group than the control group.(9)the total efficiency comparison: After treatment, the total effective rate, thedifference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion: Early treatment of tendon bonesetting interim blood stasissyndrome of knee osteoarthritis efficacy, especially in improving the patient’s painsensations from the body and joint functional activities, joint stability advantage, andsecure, low cost, worthy of clinical application and promotion.