Font Size: a A A

Analysis Of The Pros And Cons Of The Integration Of Government Agencies Based On Food Safety Supervision

Posted on:2016-12-18Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J ZhuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2279330491950204Subject:Public Administration
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Tianjin Municipal Bureau of industry and commerce, quality and technical supervision, food and drug supervision and Management Bureau of the merger, the establishment of the Tianjin market and quality supervision and Management Committee, the purpose is to integrate the food safety supervision department of Tianjin City, the food safety supervision unified. The establishment of food safety regulatory reform of the new attempt.First of all, the establishment of the Tianjin market and quality supervision and Management Committee of China’s government agencies "big system" reform of the policy, the establishment of a food safety integrated monitoring system. One can avoid such as small food manufacturing industry supervision of dead ends, so that food safety regulatory coverage is broader, more detailed regulation; the second is can exert the rational allocation of public resources to the more efficient, more conducive to the use of human resources; the third is more conducive to the supervision of the unified leadership and centralized scheduling, to give full play to the role of each regulatory functions. Food safety supervision organization of the merger is the food safety supervision system development and progress of the way, compared with before, a certain progress.However, the establishment of the Tianjin market and quality supervision and management committee is also a certain problem. First, at the present stage of China’s food safety laws and regulations are not perfect, so the integration of the Department did not fundamentally solve the problem. Second, the integration of food safety regulatory authorities is not complete, the agricultural regulatory system has not been incorporated into the food safety regulatory system, that is, from farm to table food safety integrated regulatory system is not complete. Third, the confusion of the regulatory process, the establishment of the market regulatory commission to form a four higher authorities to lead a lower level of the phenomenon, is not conducive to the implementation of regulatory directives and policies. Fourth, the integration of the Tianjin municipal market supervision committee is too bloated, institutions are too complex, the task is too heavy, and so on and so on.Finally, the author believes that the establishment of the Tianjin market and quality supervision and management committee is more harm than good, lagging behind the development needs of today’s market, but also beyond the process of the existing laws and regulations, is a food safety supervision system in the process of semi-finished. Through the continuous improvement of management level, the continuous improvement of laws and regulations, the regulatory authorities to further reform and differentiation, to avoid the emergence of the reform of the non decisive factors, can the advantages of the regulatory system to play out, so that it becomes a successful reform.
Keywords/Search Tags:"large part system" reform, food safety, market and quality supervision and Management Committee
PDF Full Text Request
Related items