| Shenzhen was established as one of the first special economic zones, and economic development but also to the work of production safety has brought unprecedented pressure. Primary production safety supervision and is a short board, also the focus of regulation, which requires grassroots regulatory authorities in ensuring safety in production at the same time, to explore a way to adapt to the needs of an effective safety supervision at this stage of the regulatory model. This study chose to Shenzhen Nanshan District Safety Authority as the representative of the grassroots regulatory authorities, and as a key research goal, and actively explore effective regulatory approach to build efficient production safety supervision mechanism for inspections.Study on production safety supervision of scholars more, but the study of grassroots production safety supervision mechanism in the exhibition tour will be very few. Under the background of rapid economic development, grassroots safety regulatory situation is worsening, with the deepening of grass-roots work, regulators uncovered a number of issues:regulatory inspection mechanism and related policies is not perfect, lack of professionals and regulatory team is weak, conventional means weakness, not high business standards, as well as the funding shortage and so on. To solve these problems, this paper Nanshan District, Shenzhen supervision of production safety work practices, functional production safety inspection mechanism, content, tools, forms, procedures, effectiveness and other initiatives by exploring Nanshan District, production safety situation, the implementation of the inquiry the main line analysis.This article draws on research results related to production safety supervision, This article draws on research results related to production safety supervision, inadequate analysis by the Nanshan District, production safety inspection mechanism, we found three problems:long supervision, unclear mandates; lack of staff, skills deficiencies and internal control punishment is not enough. By drawing the United States, Japan and Germany advanced regulatory experience, drawn from the following five aspects we need to upgrade:to further improve the legal system construction and standards; establish effective regulatory inspection system; improve the social and internal oversight mechanisms; the establishment of a unified central inspection system; the introduction of advanced inspection methods. Through the analysis of major accidents, the following revelation:mobilize social forces to participate in safety oversight; with the implementation of party and government accountability, A Pair of responsibility system. By integrating analysis is not difficult to see, whether it is a problem, experience or enlightenment, in the final analysis from six legal level, the institutional level, regulatory level, organizational system, personnel training, and working methods of the inspection mechanism has been constructed. |