The living issue, as the most significant dimension of poverty study, is always the focus of research, and it is gradually becomes the importance and difficulty in poverty management. In recent years, with the abundance and deepening of the poverty releasing related theories, the academia has taken the vulnerability as pointcut to inspect and analysis the problem of sustainable development for poor areas.Based on the existed studies, the current studies has taken too much account on the vulnerability while neglecting the combinative analysis of vulnerability and resilience. On the basis of unseparated relationship between vulnerability and resilience, this research has chosen Garze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Sichuan Province as a case, using the field interview and observation method to discuss the process of resilience based on the multiply subject.The backward of Garze is resulted from multiple vulnerability and impact, like the environment, social historical situation and so forth. This kind of vulnerability continues to influence the living action and strategy selection. To insure the living, development and continuation of self, the fanners will choose the most suitable living method to defend the shock of risk to build the living bases under the outside impact of vulnerability. However, in this process, not all the farmers can succeed in resilience. The un-sustainability of farmers makes their supportive community plays the resilient role and seek for the sustainable method to living of farmers. The resilience of community does not only contains the down to top autonomous collective action and help among farmers, but also the up-to-down lead and support from the community elites. All the community resilience can boost the human capital of farmers and provide more living method for them.Unlike the advanced communities, resilience to counter vulnerability for national and under-developed areas are limited for the natural disadvantages, which means it needs the support from government in direct and indirect ways. On the direct side, the government can connect the farmers and the community to boost the living capital for farmers, and support the community to realize the diversification of living method and living capacity. On the indirect side, government should be faced up to the vulnerable environment, decrease the impact of risks by management of disasters and improvement of ecology so as to decrease the vulnerability of Garze, reinforcing the capacities of resilience of both farmers and communities.Based on the discussion of multiple resilient subjects, farmers, community and government, this research concludes:firstly, vulnerability is the important factor that leads to the long-existed poverty, so in the poverty management, we should put more emphasis on analysis of vulnerability; Secondly, in living studies, vulnerability is not an isolated concept. We should always take its counterpart, resilience, into consideration, especially paying attention to the analysis and discussion of multiple subjected vulnerability; Thirdly, for the specialty of national areas, government should play a dominant role and stress the significance of community as a medium role under the structure of multiple subjected vulnerability study. |