| In the new period of transformation of the exam-oriented education to quality education, the slogan of lighten students burdens has shouted for20years, but it has not received a significant effect. The Karlsruhe Physics Course is different from the complex systems of previous physics textbook, The Karlsruhe Physics Course adopts a new teaching method-applying this common physical quantity of energy all branches of physics become a complete integration through the analogy. The similar textbook’s structure reduces the financial burden on the students’ learning in the circumstance that does not reduce the teaching contents. And under the advocate on the teaching idea of all flowers bloom together, Introducing foreign outstanding teaching material for increasing the diversity of physical teaching material in China plays an important role. The author inspired by the innovative teaching material structure and ideas of the Karlsruhe Physics Course. And the author compares specifically the mechanics and energy part of two different materials which are under the different core ideas.The research content of this paper has the following three aspects of the research content. First, it analyses and introduces the Karlsruhe Physics Course’s structure; Second, the comparison about mechanics between the Karlsruhe Physics Course and the physics teaching material. It included in the comparison of the whole structure of mechanical parts and the key chapter-----specific comparative analysis of the pressure and the buoyancy. Third, the comparison about the energy of two teaching materials. It includes the energy function of the Karlsruhe Physics Course and the comparison about the structure of Energy between two teaching materials. It is focused on comparing two sets of the content of thermodynamics between two teaching materials at last.(1) The differences of two teaching materials’ knowledge structural:The setting of the overall structure in the Karlsruhe Physics Course focus on the affiliation and the primary and secondary relationship of the teaching material content, the level is very clear, the be clear at a glance. And take into account the physics as a whole and the relationship between each branch part. And it takes the relationship between the physics as a whole and each branch parts into account; the whole structure of the junior middle school physics teaching material in our country is the straight-line, it go forward one by one. According to difficulty of the knowledge content briefly, it did not elaborate design the inner link of teaching material content.(2) In terms of the content of the textbooks covers, the mechanics and energy part of KPK Physics Course contains richer content more comprehensive, more in-depth; The junior high school physics textbook’s knowledge contents are accessible.At the same time, the scope that it involved is smaller.(3) The differences of the presentation on two teaching material:In the junior middle school physics teaching material, the content which rendered are more physical laws, but the deriving of the principle is not given.In the Karlsruhe Physics Course, arrangement of the diagram case is relatively smaller, formula derivation and written description are most. This is not only adapted to the junior middle school stage student’s cognition rule, but also corresponding increased the depth of the teaching materials’ content. It provides students the place of thinking with in-depth; It provides the deep thinking of the conditions and opportunities for students who interested in physics.(4) The difference of two textbooks’ understanding difficult:It is easier to understand of energy transfer applying the thought of the Karlsruhe Physics Course "flow". In the part of mechanics, the energy transfer is accompanied by momentum flow transmission. In the part of the thermodynamics, the energy transfer is accompanied by entropy flow transmission. The quantities which have the similar structure make physics system be together by means of analogy.(5) Two differences in the cultivation of the students’ learning between two teaching materials:As the whole, Because of the Karlsruhe Physics Course adopt the method of analogy to arrange teaching content. The energy part in the teaching materials due to the teaching material structure adopts the method of analogy. This organization way is conducive to subsequently learn. In the introduction of new curriculum, Students have accumulated experience, and it can cause the students’ interest in learning.(6) The differences of two teaching materials illustrations:The image Settings in the teaching materials should pay attention to the typicality of pictures. Making the universal illustrations clear which is to the benefit of cultivating the students’ ability to migrate. It can apply law to the phenomenon through an example to understand the principle. The most of the illustrations of junior middle school physics teaching materials are pictures and not carry on the processing, having no general mobility; The images of the Karlsruhe Physics Course has carried on the simple processing, and choosing the typical illustration to analysis.(7) In the aspect of systemic, In the Karlsruhe Physics Course, the knowledge contents of mechanics and energy part is unified in the system. The junior high school physics textbook’s knowledge between each other are separated, did not form a complete system.The Karlsruhe Physics Course pays attention to students’ systematic thinking and the cultivation of independent thinking ability, But due to the state of the differences between China and Germany, and the two countries of middle school students psychological development characteristic and the different knowledge structure, The Karlsruhe Physics Course introducing cannot be copied. Education developed areas in the eastern part of our country, Textbook writing when absorbing the thoughts of the Karlsruhe Physics Course1will help middle school education transport independent thinking ability talents to society. But this setting of teaching material for education relatively underdeveloped areas is difficult for students, and can not play its proper role.After the introducing on the Karlsruhe Physics Course and comparing on the overall structure of the Karlsruhe Physics Course, the author detailed compares the content of the mechanics and energy part. But it did not involve comparative analysis of electromagnetism. And the Comparing contents pay more attention on details, it is incomplete. It is not involved in comparison of the teaching material difficult. |
PDF Full Text Request