Study On The Legal Problems Of The Public Information Communication In Emergency

Since twenty-first Century, the human society has constantly underwent various unexpected events, starting from SARS of2003to the Wenchuan earthquake in2008, from9·11in the United States of2001to2011Japan’s Fudao island earthquake and so on. We have to admit that these events are natural disasters and we can do is to positively face them:a warning before k, a good job when and the follow-up support post-disaster recovery and reconstruction. Due to the uncertainty and failure characteristics of these unexpected events, when they happened, the public’s demand for information is more urgent than normal. But the government did not inform or untimely inform and other reasons for a long time. It led to the spread of public suspicion and rumors which often triggered man-made crisis after natural disasters. So we take this opportunity to think deeply about the problems of the public information dissemination in the emergency.The main body part is divided into four chapters. In the introduction, the author simply illustrates the origin of the paper, the domestic and foreign research situation, the research limitations and difficulties in writing this article. The first chapter is the basic theory of the public information communication in emergency section. Firstly, it analyzes and sets forth the basic theory of sudden events and information transmission and clearly shows the problems to be discussed. The second part introduces the problems and reasons of China’s public information dissemination in emergency. It analyzes the respective position in the emergency information dissemination of tripartite bodies:the government, the media and the public and each of the problems. The local governments considered their administrative performance and the implementation of the accountability system is not in place. So they concealed, not reported and underreported. The media did not play its due role as a bridge in emergency information dissemination because of on our current promotional system. Due to the government’s failure to adequately inform the emergency-related information, and the usual lack of training and education to the public of emergencies and emergencies in the ability to identify, so the public’s identification of crisis information capacity is low. The third chapter mainly introduces the foreign advanced experience of crisis communication management and the enlightenment to our country. The fourth chapter is the key of this article and difficult to write. It continues to propose some practical legal measures for the government, the media and the public. The government should perfect administrative accountability system and the information disclosure laws and regulations. The media on the one hand needs to ensure that the rights of the media, on the other hand needs to be supervised by the government. For the public, it emphasizes to enhance citizens’ sense of crisis and the anti-crisis capacity, raise public awareness of media literacy, and strengthen the training of public awareness of the law. It hopes can do some help to the regulation of our country’s emergency public information dissemination.