| Abstract:"The Food Safety" from the legislation height to CSR a declaratoryprincipled stipulation, clear the food manufactures taking the main responsible for thefood quality and safety. But this is a "soft constraint", no specific tell what’s meaning,so how to execute the food manufactures’ CSR is the problem.The connotation of Food Manufactures’ CSR is the responsibility about foodmanufactures should be integrity, ruled by law, ensure the food safety and does notdamage the legitimate interests of the stakeholders, and then to achieve its economicfunction and create more social comprehensive benefits. Following the state aboutfood safety, matching between rule of law and self-discipline exist an interactiveoperation form.“Just for food safety field,“CSR “legislation and judicial practice isstill in its infancy, Food manufactures must face a lot of difficulties. At present, cometrue their CSR have three paths: first, forced to perform; second, focus onself-discipline, but the food safety law system for specification guidelines; Third,focus on compulsory legislation that organic combination with standards supported,and self-discipline is subsidiary. Because the seriousness about our food safetyproblems are highlighted at present, food manufactures practice CSR need combiningcompulsory and self-discipline, especially compulsory do a primary principle, sochoose the third implementation path obviously more accord with our nationalcondition.Therefore, First, Request the Food Safety Law System clear the legal restraintmechanism; Next, Request them timely integrate the excitation adjustmentmechanism; Third, Further maintain the relevant system to them to practice the CSR,perfect the system implement; Finally, According to the effectiveness of theimplementation of the food safety standards, strengthen the guidance. |