| Anti-Japanese War, is the key time of Marxist historiography which from the pioneer stage to the maturity. In this period, Marxist historiography not only launched monograph after monograph which has the great academic value, and contribute the new paradigm of the general history book, but also in the construction of the history discipline system made a series of breakthrough significance of exploration and push forward. Some scholars thus think this phase of Marxist historiography, is the peak of the development history of the Marxist historiography throughout the twentieth century. Though not without bias, but also definitely not speculation.In particular, behind a series of brilliant achievements made by the Marxist historiography of the period, with a hard and serious historical material construction project. If the period of Marxist historiography as a towering academic building, so, the historical material construction is undoubtedly the history mansion of brick and tile. However, long-term since, academics concern about the academic building increase, the research results, emerge in endlessly; But less person make inquires for the mansion of the brick and tile, has not yet been a systematic study. In the long run, the mansion on suspicion of becoming a castle in the air. In view of this, this paper to this period of Marxist historian of material construction as the center, hope through systematically comb this period of Marxist historian made hard exploration and major results in historical materials field, to reappear the original of the academic building construction.Paper is divided into four parts. The first part is "the raising question and review of the academic history", first proposed own consciousness of question, revealed the writing purpose of the thesis, and made the review of the academic history over it had the research, analyzes the value of these research results and its shortcomings.The second part is "the early historical material explore", look back on the Anti-Japanese War before, Marxist historian made the exploration process and major gains in the field of historical materials. Through the back, on the one hand, to sum up the achievements and shortcomings in the historical material study of the early Marxist historians, and made some kind of foreshadowding for the next stage of the historical material building; On the other hand also reveals some kind of academic resources in the process that later systematic construction of the historical materials study.The third part is the " historical material construction in the period of Anti-Japanese War". This is the full text of the focus, aim to systematically comb the Marxist historians of the Anti-Japanese War in the field of historical materials’ exploration, and summary of their academic achievement. By combing and summarizing, reveals the Marxist historian from the excavations of prehistory and early history data, and then deep into this development trend that a systematic exploration of Chinese ancient history data.The fourth part is "epilogue", summarize the full text, puts forward the author’s concluding conclusion with the historical material construction of Marxist historians during the Anti-Japanese WarThis study showed that in recent years academic circles popular so-called "Historical Materials" and "Conception of History" dualistic division, may not all appropriate to the truth of separation and reunion among each school of China’s modern history. At least, the Marxist historiography without analysis classified the so-called "Conception of History", you will not be able to see different emphases at the different stages of historical changes in trajectory, and the differences of the academic main purpose implied in this changes. As this paper research the period, the Marxist historiography’ exploration and gain in the field of historical materials, it did not less than at that time on the mainstream position so-called "Historical Materials". Therefore, the division standard established base on the duality of historical materials and conception of history opposites is worth thinking about. |