Observation Of Non Operation Of Spinal Decompression Technique In The Treatment Of Lumbar Disc Herniation

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is based on the non operation spinal decompression systemSDS9800and common lumbar traction for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation(LDH) clinical and imaging results were observed and compared, which discuss theclinical and imaging of non operation spinal decompression system SDS9800in thetreatment of lumbar disc herniation clinical advantages, compared with ordinarytraction.MethodsThe40cases of lumbar diagnosis and suitable for non operation treatment of discherniation patients are grouped according to sequence and randomization time patients.From40cases of patients with lumbar disc herniation in selected20cases asexperimental group, taking the conventional bed rest therapy methods, application ofSDS9800non operation treatment of spinal decompression system. The other20casesof lumbar disc herniation patients as the control group, in addition to the base of thesame bed rest therapy, lumbar traction treatment to be ordinary. Two groups of patientswith lumbar disc herniation respectively before treatment and4weeks after one courseof treatment were full, to the lumbar magnetic resonance examination, measurement ofintervertebral disc protrusion from the transverse and sagittal plane were size andreturning, to observe the imaging effect. In addition, the Oswestry disability index (ODI)and visual analogue scale (VAS) respectively on the rehabilitation assessment andcollection of relevant data after4weeks of treatment, patients before treatment, and to observe its clinical effect. At the end of the related data were analyzed and summarizedby statistical software spss.18.0.ResultsBy statistical analysis showed, general situation of the two groups were no obviousdifferences such as age, body weight. Before treatment, the test group ODI score was46.75±6.63, VAS was7.25±1.02, MRI measurement of intervertebral disc protrusionsize was4.45±1.57mm; the control group ODI was45.70±4.57, VAS was7.65±0.75, MRI measurement of intervertebral disc protrusion size was4.90±1.12; twogroups of patients the clinical and imaging features are similar, no statisticallysignificant difference between the P>0.05group. Experimental group after treatment,ODI score was23.50±4.82, VAS was2.30±0.92, MRI measurement of intervertebraldisc protrusion size was1.90±1.02mm; the control group ODI was27.30±4, VASwas3.25±0.55, MRI measurement of intervertebral disc protrusion size was2.90±1.12; after4weeks after the treatment of two groups of patients with clinical andimaging manifestations were improved, but the experimental group improved moresignificantly than the control group, the difference between the two groups wasstatistically significant P<0.05.ConclusionThe non operation group two patients with spinal decompression system SDS9800forspinal decompression in the treatment of the general situation, before treatment, ODIand VAS score, MRI measurement of intervertebral disc protrusion size had nosignificant difference. At4weeks after treatment, the clinical and imaging inexperimental group was significantly better than the control group study. In the courseof treatment, obvious adverse reaction and side effect was not found in the two groupsof patients, the treatment system has good safety, patient tolerance. Therefore, in this study, non operation spinal decompression system SDS9800is a noninvasive, safe,efficient, comfortable in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, the imaging andclinical curative effect is better than that of ordinary traction, have broad applicationprospects.