The Falsification Mechanisms In Cyberspace

For a long time, due to the asymmetry of social information, resulting in the blindspot of many public events, so that people do not know the real trend of public events. Thisage of mass communication in the relatively isolated external interactive informationexchange, there is no solution. However, everyone involved in the interaction of theInternet age, people have truth-seeking opportunities, seek the truth and that is falsifiable.But in the era of new media, the explosion of the network of public opinion, andsometimes the public the truth about the network of public opinion, together with theofficial attitude is unknown, true and false blending of information content ambiguouspolysemy network of public opinion, to make it to the fact that public opinion fuzzy disruptthe network moral order, not only the general public began to lose their ability to judgedetermine the truth of the incident, the public do not know true and false, greatlychallenged social trust. For example the Tiger Week event, Xia event, square Korean war,Brunei aid cases, the various official second-generation rich second generation event,Zouheng Fu microblogging events, and so difficult to distinguish true and false events,which we need to seek truth and certificate it. With the help of Habermas’ public spheretheory, combined with specific cases, explore cyberspace false information, explorecyberspace falsification mechanism.The full text is mainly composed of three parts by the introduction, body andconclusion. Introduction accountable research background, the status quo, study andresearch methods. The text is divided into five parts: The first chapter gives an overview ofthe new features of the Web2.0networks of public space, the reconstruction of thetraditional public domain analysis, and summed up the problems of the Web2.0networkpublic space; The second chapter describes the cyberspace information true and false game,focusing on analysis of the reasons of false information in the network; The third chapter cyberspace falsifiable power sources, mainly from citizens eager to know the truthdemands, inequality protest demands, compassion demands and punishing demands ofthese four areas to be discussed further demonstrate the necessity and urgency of thenetwork falsification; Fourth chapter elaborated falsifiable, there are mainlynon-governmental scientific organizations, public opinion management, traditional mediaand new media cooperation of these three, now the falsification way on the network isbecoming more diverse and specialized on these three methods; Fifth chapter mainly onthe value of the mechanism of network falsification guidance of public opinion and civilsociety, in order to explain the relationship between the network falsification mechanismwith civil society, in order to take a better approach to the operation of the networkfalsification mechanism. The epilogue to review the full text and concluded that there is aproblem.