Study On The Mechanism Of Positive Interaction Between The China’s Internet Of The Public Opinion And The Justice

Internet as a public expression of a new field from the development of modern information technology, and poor public opinion expression mechanism of the dual needs and opportunities, on this basis, the supervision of the Internet of public opinion gradually erode the boundaries of the judicial activities domain. Scholars from a different perspective on the relationship between the judicial and the network of public opinion, the interpretation of divergent views. I carefully combed the different views of scholars, through the elaboration of the status of the network of public opinion and judicial relations, analysis of the two causes of conflict, trying to build a network of public opinion and judicial interaction mechanism.This article is divided into three parts, mainly in the following aspects:In the first part, elaborated the concept of meaning, function and characteristics of public opinion, the Internet of public opinion and Justice, both the interactions between the ideal model, as discussed later pave the way. And then describes the Internet of public opinion and judicial relations in our country’s status quo, the impact of judicial activities. After further explore the causes of the conflict between the two, such as:the existence of the network of violence, lack of Internet public opinion rational, internet freedom, makes the information overload and information alienation; the intensification of the crisis of judicial trust; the role of differences in network public opinion and judicial activities. The last part of the path of the positive interaction of the Internet of public opinion and judicial construction of the mechanism and specific implementation measures. Only to seek the right balance between the two, to find the best fit point in order to achieve a positive interaction between the two, thus promoting the process of democracy and the rule of law.