Marx Guoguguan With Northrop Chick Guoguguan Integration With Points To

Culture is the core of all political issues. The number of theories of a state willdepend on those of national definition. Critique of Marx for made a comprehensiveinvestigation on the contradiction and the law of the development of the nationalbourgeoisie and the bourgeois society by respectively criticizing the political andeconomic two clues, which reveals that the country is on the basis of social materiallife, and that it is related to the public power developing from the social division oflabor during a certain stage. Marx, also from a the basic values--real social democracyand people’s general liberation, puts forward that the general social functions of acountry will lose the nature of its political rule of the class, and that they will becomereal general social functions in the future. Countries will become extinct; humanwill realize universal liberation and human’s self-management.Robert Nozick, as the representative of liberalism among the western politicalphilosophies, opposed to Rawls’ opinions that he claims the function of the country isexpanded to the distribution field in order to remedy the phenomenon of socialinequality. He thinks expansion of a state function is bound to harm the rights of thepeople. So he put forward that national justice, first of all, lies in the guarantee ofindividual rights. Personal rights have priority, and the state will not allow invasionson the rights of individuals. He believes that what individual rights leave to countriesis only the existence of the country in the weakest sense. Only can Minimal State fullyprotect the rights of the freedom of the individual, which is morally legitimate. As aresult he proposed his own minimal state theory.This article from the perspective of historical materialism, Marx and Nozickcountry theory contrast analysis, on the one hand dug up chick minimum state theoryin virtually on Marx country theory response, on the other hand, discusses thedifferences of both theory and demonstrates Marx country theory is scientific, and digout Nozick country theory realistic meaning to contemporary Chinese reform. Thisarticle mainly divides into four parts. The first part is introduction, elaborated theresearch background, research significance, research status at home and abroad, and thebreakthrough point of the article and innovation points. Second part system, discussedthe development of Marx’s public power country theory, from the state and civilsociety relations, personal life, class contradictions development demonstrates thenature and origin of the state, and then derive the free people is the highest form of national development. The third part expounds Nozick right highest country theory,system analysis of the Nozick country theory mode of origin, the reasoning andargumentation. Nozick argument is powerful and challenging, but it still contains a lotof difficult to overcome weaknesses. Fourth part by comparing Marx and Nozickcountry theory, demonstrates Marx country theory is scientific, and dig out Nozickcountry theory practical significance, to our country socialist market economy underthe condition of national function, distribution and other issues have importantsignificance.This article tries to make a comparative analysis of the view of country betweenMarx and Nozick from the perspective of historical materialism. Through the analysis,on one hand, the author finds that the minimal state theory proposed by Nozickresponse to the view of country proposed by Marx. On the other hand, the authorprobes into the differences of both these two theories. And then the authordemonstrates the scientificalness of the view of country proposed by Marx and findsout the realistic meaning of the view of country proposed by Nozick to the Chinesereform in the present age. This article is mainly divided into four parts. The first partis introduction which illustrates the meaning of this topic, theoretical background andresearch background at home and abroad. The second part systematically talks aboutthe development of Marx’s view of country. It demonstrates the nature and origin ofthe state from aspects of the relations between the state and city residents, personallife and the development of class contradictions and then the author derives unite offree people is the highest form of national development. The third part expounds theview of country proposed by Nozick that power is the highest in the world. The authorsystematically analyzes the origin, process of argumentation and ways ofargumentation of Nozick’s view. His argument is powerful and challenging, but it stillcontains a lot of weak points which is difficult to overcome. The fourth partdemonstrates the view of Marx is scientific and digs out the practical meaning bycomparing his view with the view of Nozick. And it brings important enlightenmentsto national functions, distributions and many other issues under the condition ofsocialist market economy.