| In this thesis we compared the corresponding patterns of the "de" sentence in Japanese and Korean, discovered compared to the Korean, Japanese is close to Chinese in the corresponding patterns of the "de" sentence. Then we put forward the acquisition hypothesis. At last through the comparison of the outputs and errors of the Japanese and Korean, most of the patterns were approved and a small number of the patterns may be vulnerable to the effects of other factors. Although contrastive analysis theory has some shortcomings, it still can be a guidance to Chinese teaching. Meanwhile,we also hope while teaching the Chinese as a foreign language, researchers and teachers can realize the differences between Japan and Korea.This work can be divided into8chapters.The first chapter, introduction,including the significance, language sources and the research methods of the thesis.The second chapter, related research, reviews the researchs in "de" and second language teaching.The third chapter, the classification of "de" sentence.Through the discussion of the existing classification of "de" sentences,we divided the "de" sentences into2big classes and11small classes.The fourth chapter, the counterparts of "de" sentence in Japanese and Korean. Through the contrast, we found the differences and similarities in the counterparts of "de" sentence in Japanese and Korean. According to it, we put forward the hypothesis.The fifth chapter, the analysis and comparison of the output of the Japanese and Korean. Analyze the uses of Japan and Korea, and compared it to the native speakers. Finally concluded the consistencies and differences of the output of Japanese and Korean.The sixth chapter, error analysis of "de" sentences of Japanese and Korean.analyze and classify the errors in11sentences.The seventh chapter, hypothesis test and teaching advice.In this chapter we combined the output and errors to prove the hypothesis.most of the sentences was verified.The eighth chapter, Summarize the main contents of the shortingcoming and the insufficiency. |