Exploration Of Evaluation Method Of Wildlife Tourism Resource In Nature Reserve

Nature Reserve is a kind natural gene library and laboratory. including hundreds of thousands of species of wildlife, which have very high aesthetic, cultural and scientific value. To establish a set of index system for the evaluation of nature reserve wildlife tourism resources to evaluate the suitability of the wildlife tourism is of great significance for the future sustainable development of nature reserves. In this paper, the author combined theory with actual case, and raised a set of index system for the evaluation of nature reserve wildlife tourism resources and evaluation model through literature review approach. Delphi method and mathematical analysis method to fill such blank field. The conclusions reached in this article are as follows:(1) Define the evaluation object of the nature reserve wildlife tourism resources. It involved mammals, birds and insects three aspects.(2) Establish an evaluation index system of the nature reserve wildlife tourism resources. The aesthetic value ranked the first with the weights of0.65. the cultural value ranked the second with the weights of0.25. and the scientific value ranked the third with the weights of0.10. And the author raised six evaluation indexes involving beauty, exotic, historic culture connotation, folk culture connotation, rare and science indexes.(3) Raise the nature reserve wildlife tourism resources evaluation model firstly, and divide it into three levels, such as special level, good level and general level.(4) Evaluate the total value of wildlife tourism resources in Taibai Mountain Nature. The author screened a total of238kinds of wildlife species, with30kinds of mammals.141kinds of birds, and67kinds of insects. Through evaluation we caught the results that mammal tourism resource scored70. bird tourism resource scored59. and insect tourism resource scored56. And the value of Taibai Mountain Nature wildlife tourism resources was64points. The level of its resources belonged to good level (60≤S<80). which reflected the wildlife tourism resources had a better competitiveness. a higher tourism value, and a vast wildlife tourism development prospect...