A Comparative Study Of "Hekuang" And "Kuangqie" | Posted on:2012-08-21 | Degree:Master | Type:Thesis | Country:China | Candidate:L Y Mei | Full Text:PDF | GTID:2215330368980203 | Subject:Linguistics and Applied Linguistics | Abstract/Summary: | PDF Full Text Request | This paper makes deep comparison between two words "hekuang" and "kuangqie" from the semantic, syntactical and pragmatic point of view, and it is composed of five Parts:The first part is the preface. In this part, we fix the object of our research, introduce the general situation of Predecessors researches on the two words and explain the ideas of our research and the source of example sentences we used in the paper.The second part is the research on the two words from the semantic point of view.In this part, we analyze the source of "hekuang" and "kuangqie" firstly, confirm that "hekuang" comes from "kuang "but "kuangqie" comes from "qie " or "kuangqie". At the same time, we use the explanations of the two words in some authorized dictionaries so as to classify them and make selections among them. Combining sentence as example and their sources, we define the two words again:"hekuang" contains of "hekuang1" "hekuang2" and "hekuang3", but "kuangqie" only has one meaning, we cannot use "kuangqie" to express anti-force deduce.And then, we compare the two words later on the semantics of the front and behind. On the foundation of Predecessors researches, we investigate that "hekuang1" former parts and the latter ones is anti-force deduce, and analyze the semantics premise, process of anti-force deduce and semantics direction of "hekuang1" sentences. We investigate the sentences of "hekuang2 "and" kuangqie " semantics relation, and fix that they not only exist in "dijin" relationship, but also in "binglie" relationship, elaborate the problem of main reason and secondary reason, further, think that there is a main reason or a secondary reason have a great relation of "dijin" or "binglie" relationship, mental state and the cultural background and personal purpose has a tremendous relation too; The semantics of "hekuang3" is similar to "hekuang1", the biggest dissimilarity lie in pragmatics.The third part is the research on the two words from the syntactical point of view. In this part, we analyze that the location of two words are basically same, and investigate the two words at the same time when they use with adverb, and the reason why that "hai ", "you","ye","geng" do not have the ability to connect with "kuangqie" for using. Carried on analysis and closing research to the "geng-hekuang" sentence. We conclude that "hekuang" and adverb can be used together. Investigated "hekuang" and "kuangqie" used continuously and repeatedly, found this usage can highlight the "dijin" relationship arrangement.The fourth part is the research on the two words from the pragmatic point of view, in this part, we investigate the circumstance of omission or appearance of the two words, and the reason of "hekuang1'"s appearance. And "hekuang2"and "kuangqie" be appearance or be omitted apply on the conditions, found the regulation of "hekuang 3" appearance or be omitted. We analyze the condition when they are used in writing material or spoken material, we found that "hekuang" is used more popularly than "kuangqie" in spoken language, but in the written language it is not so obvious, and found how to explain this kind of phenomenon. In the part of pragmatics function, we inquired that "hekuang1" have simple function; "hekuang3"have the function of excessive emphasis, derivation new topic, lay stress on the focus, the two words both have emphasizing and contrasting function.In the fifth part, we summarises the two words from the angle of being replaceable. | Keywords/Search Tags: | Hekuang, Kuangqie, Semantics, Syntax, Pragmatics | PDF Full Text Request | Related items |
| |
|