Mandarin Variorum "doubts

GuoYu is an important pre-Qin classics. Legend has it written for the Spring and Autumn Period by Zuoqiu Ming. It is China's earliest country-history with important history value and literary value, so is valued by always scholars, and has the multi-people for it work note, of which Weizhao's Notes is the earliest and the most comprehensive one. It saved a lot of ancient notes and corrected the wrong interpretations of them. Weizhao's time is not far from GuoYu,so that his notes is essentially objective and reliable.The traditional primary research have achieved to peak down to the Qing Dynasty, scholars of the time have done a lot of finishing work on ancient classics, the GuoYu is also in this column. The following list is more important: Wang YuanSun'sGuoYuSanJunZhuJiCun, LiuTaiGong'sGuoYuJiaoBu,WangZhong'sGuoYu JiaoWen,ChenZhuan'sGuoYuYiJie,WangYinZhi'sJingYiShuWen,YuYue'sQunJingPing Yi, DongZengLing's GuoYuZhengYi,WuZengQi's GuoYuWeiJieBuZheng and so on. After finishing the test Qingru have argued that many issues have been discussed again, the understanding of GuoYu will be closer to the facts themselves.GuoYuJiJie is a modern book informed by Xuyuangao, the first edition in 1930, published by the Zhonghuashuju. GuoYu and Wei's Notes have all been published in this paper, on the basis of this, selected each of the collation and Notes for the Senate to their views and brought together all research results, so that it is easy to read. Zhonghuashuju published the revised version in 2005. Meanwhile we should clear that there are still a lot of doubtful questions. The paper has gathered 138 doubtful points, which are distributed into three chapters by their types. The first consists of 5 poins of punctuation errors ; the second involves of 24points of emendation;The third comprises 109 annotation errors,which can divided into three types: firstly, some of WeiZhao's annotation could not stand up but are not corrected by schoolers of past and present; secondly, some corrections toward WeiZhao's annotation are still not to the point; lastly, a few phnetic loan characters have not been pointed out.