Brief Probe Into Why The Dialectics Of Nature Exist

Engels’s Dialectics of Nature is on controversial since its inception. It becomes a major theoretical platform about how to properly treat the natural dialectic theory of Engels for the debate of orthodox Marxist scholars and Western Marxist scholars. This has important theoretical significance on how to treat the relationship between people and nature, nature and history, between subject object. What’s more it’s conducive to a better understanding of Marxist philosophy system.The paper will combe thorough to the course of certainly Dialectics of Nature and the negative. Dialectics of Nature experienced a positive affirmation of Soviet Union, new Hegelian certainty as well as after entered China. While, mainly to Western Marxist scholars explained the dialectics and reach the opposing views with Marx’s and Engels’from the humanistic point of view, they believed the scientific that Engels Dialectics of Nature embodied is empirical deviated from the Marxist dialectic thinking historic, subjectivity, negativity and philosophical, and then deny the establishment of Dialectics of Nature. The dialectics of nature supporters defend Dialectics of Nature refute from the starting point of negative’s.What is dialectics, what is natural dialectics, what is Engels’view of nature and dialectical and whether Engels’Dialectics of Nature has historical and practical significance are core issues we need to know, and the issues are sorted out by paining through natural dialectic between the Negation and affirmation of those factions who view, and then analysis opposition and contradiction point of two points perspective. The focus of the difference between Marx and Engels is whether there is subjectivity involved, so is it requires human intervention? If there is, and then the nature no human interrupt, there is no dialectic? Beside the human factors, Engels Dialectics of Nature whether present or is present in what sense?The third and fourth part of this paper is to answer above questions. It analysis and concludes the view of dialectical and nature of Hegel, Marx and Engels, while introduce two different concepts of time and space. And then, it presents three preestablished about why dialectics of nature reset. It lies in the existence of the dialectics of nature whether conformed its rational. In the static of Newton’s time and space, human subjectivity is to the limited, one can recognize and change the nature as a spectator. So. nature at ontological sense without human beings does not exist. There is no simple dialectics of nature. But at epistemology andpractice sense, the Engels’ Dialectics of Nature exist. In the new time and space，natureconforms its rational by itself, nothing to do with the existence of the human mind or not.People just be as a transition of the universe exists. So nature at ontological sense withouthuman beings does not exist. Meanwhile in the new space, people’s awareness andunderstanding of nature is dialectical, and it is also dialectical to thinking itself namelyrecognized in itself. Deepening of human knowledge is inseparable from the practice, thepractice of human history itself poses dialectic. So, naturally dialectics on the epistemologicalsigniifcance and practical signiifcance is established.