Will The Corporate Culture Surmount National Culture?

This article consists of "theoretical examination" and "a proof study". For Chapter 2"cross-cultural management theory", I examine a theory from each genre to be related to the cross-cultural management that has been developed in conventional international business administration and clarify it about a background of switch of the theory.In this chapter, I begin with a definition of traditional international business administration and review a fact and the theory that have been discovered through positioning of cross-cultural management theory to occupy it in it and a study of a multinational management theory and explain multinational of a company in international management and evolution of a management system. And I clarify that the aim that the multinational enterprise which passed through some stages should finally aim at is trans-national model.Furthermore, I explain that there are need, it which take in culture as an important element of management again at companies various organizations besides a country without I begin it from a definition of culture and preach it and wake up how a general idea of culture is related to these for a theory, and I hit it if it runs multinational and do not consider culture and a saying element, and going.The conventional study that has been pushed forward by a culture theory point of view explains that a point of view whether you tie it not being met a request of time now, the staff of the background that is how different while I am different, andacceptance affirms a difference not a point of view to deal again of country culture who invited the global times to is necessary afterwards although the contribution is big. On that occasion, as well as results of research of a comparison study every country about company management and many culture comparison, I point out a study of Hofstede and Trompenaars which are an authority of a cross-cultural study and the result and the problems. And I assume that a viewpoint secondary, to arrest country culture meets it by world situation of the present age after having introduced a wider cross-cultural study attracting attention recently and introduce the latest result.I consider it about the present conditions of the Japan company where it has been said to that I stand in comparison with a European and American company for dozens of years, and globalization is late with Chapter 3. On that occasion I give an outline about manufacturing industry, service trade, the nucleus a medium and small-sized business and recommend "transformer National type" "Transcultural type" now as a problem of the Japanese multinational enterprise where is seen in and the direction that I should aim at.I will generalize Part 1. If I do a Bartlett and Ghoshal, Adler, the cross-cultural management theory that I insisted on of Magoshi with a base and apply the international management theory that I analyzed to here to management of a Japanese-company in China, I can put up the following proposition.A multinational enterprise should aim at the model that is transformer National of world intention. Therefore I utilize own mother country culture of the judgment that the staff who came from different culture is fair as useful management resources, and an effective result is provided in the whole group company. An area and flexible correspondence for a change of the times are included to be able to warp.A thing harmonizing the various staffs having a different background is culture of the company where the they staff is deep and can sympathize with concerned. Therefore fairness doctrine is gone through, and I am not discriminated by a difference of mother country culture, and personality as the company where all staffs can approve of even if, in addition, they have a background of country culture to bedifferent in them is shown.Chapter 4 "example investigation" is analysis as a result of example investigation that I went for three Japanese-companies in 2005. Question content of investigation is based on the ideal model that new development and a Japanese-company of the cross-cultural management theory that I already arranged by problem submission should have, and it is set. I asked three multinational enterprises which represented Japan in the Chengdu city for cooperation how globalization progressed in the Japanese-multinational enterprise where I came to carry today when globalization advanced, a role of Chinese globalization on. It was enforced in Europe by Magoshi that investigation of similar content is a chairperson of a Japanese cross-cultural study society, but it is the place that is interesting whether a result to be similar as expected in China which was snowbound with "a curtain of bamboo" till now is confirmed. China is incorporated in a global frame now, and that transformation of country culture advances is observed, but global management technique comes to even Japanese a living-in-inside multinational enterprise to a stage to pass and attracts attention whether it "is it till the superior corporate culture that a global company has exceeds country culture anymore".It is the last, chapter and, based on findings, deals with a difference of country culture in state of things as a company and shows the method that should utilize it as effective management resources. I emphasize that effective synergy effect and agreement are provided by letting it seep to every corner in a company what kind of corporate culture I should get to gather up a more multi-national employee.