Study On Objective Mode Of China Essential Higher Education Massification--Multi-disciplinary Views

When we are facing the problem of 'Abrupt-developing Higher Education Massification', 'fear and uncertain feelings lead by press and nervousness are inevitable'. Rational study can help us go out from these feelings.This thesis tries to answer the following three questions: What is 'Objective Mode of Essential Higher Education Massification'? Why it is our ideal chose? How can it come to truth? Development is a comprehensive concept, which should conclude two measuring dimensions: quantity and quality. It is not enough for 'Trow Theory' to use only quantity —— Gross Enrollment Ratio of Higher Education to measure development ; What's more, it is misleading. Therefore, we put forward a new concept and objective mode —— 'Essential Higher Education Massification'. We think 'Essential Higher Education Massification' is the ideal objective mode of China higher education massification. Logically, to negate 'Abrupt-developing Higher Education Enrollment Expansion' is to regard 'Objective Mode of Essential Higher Education Massification' as positive.Due to higher education system's complication, it is indispensable for us to use 'Multi-disciplinary Views' to answer the question that why 'Objective Mode of Essential Higher Education Massification' is our ideal chose. In the scope of the world, this thesis studies the relevance between GNP ( per capita ) and Gross Enrollment Ratio of Higher Education. This study and the experience of India higher education development both prove that 'Abrupt-developing Higher Education Enrollment Expansion' is not the right way. Above is the view of Comparative Pedagogy; In the view of Educational Economics, between 'Abrupt-developing Higher EducationEnrollment Expansion' and 'Higher Education Enrollment Expansion Alienation', between 'Abrupt-developing Higher Education Enrollment Expansion' and 'Education Developing in Advance', between 'Abrupt-developing Higher Education Enrollment Expansion' and 'Higher Education Economic Function Playing Well', there is a certain relation, and higher education can not burden so much; Educational Sociology expresses its view from the following two angles: the relation between 'Abrupt-developing Higher Education Enrollment Expansion' and 'Education Ecological Balance'; 'Abrupt-developing Higher Education Enrollment Expansion' and 'Educational Fare'. Finally, it is the view of Educational Philosophy. Its core idea is that higher education should keep balance between 'Philosophy of Politics' and 'Philosophy of Knowledge', and obey both inner and outer rules of higher education, and keep lasting developing. All those above views of different disciplines prove that 'Objective Mode of Essential Higher Education Massification' is our ideal chose.The last part of this thesis is to answer 'how' which is the policy meanings of choosing 'Objective Mode of Essential Higher Education Massification': Firstly, to bring '(Essential) Higher Education Massification' into truth by 'Gradual-developing Higher Education Enrollment Expansion'; Secondly, to keep and develop 'Elite Higher Education', and to diversify higher education; Thirdly, to build and perfect scientific quantity guarantee system of '(Essential) Higher Education Massification'.