| In the 1990s, the core of higher education quality assurance of higher education assessment activities in the world created an upsurge. With the emergence of higher education, social demands for more and more talent, then the quality of education becomes increasingly important. At beginning of the 1980s, our government began to attach importance to the quality of the field of higher education assessment. From then on, China's higher education quality assessment of higher education evaluation are very administrative, the higher education appraisal laws and regulations strengthened government's role in higher education appraisal work as main body status gradually. With the application of the new public service theory and the theory of management, this centralized model of the evaluation system is to promote higher education quality improvement, caused widespread concern in the higher education sector.This article takes the new public service theory and governance theory as the rationale, recommends and explains foreign higher education evaluation in three typical models, namely the government centralized model, government guidance model, social control model; analyzes the role of our government played in higher education centralization, and analyzes advantages and disadvantages such a role brings. Finally, using analysis frame of the new public service theory, the theory of public products and governance theory, analyzes our country Government's role in higher education appraisal, proposes the conception of "government role differentiation", namely, the government should give up the centralization role, take on service role, guiding role, the role of monitoring and advocacy role, so as to provide a reference to the second round of higher education evaluation. |
