The Comparison And Study On The Leadership Between Lenin And Gramsci

Not only has the issue of leadership been the hot issue of concern to Chinese and foreign academics, but also It has been paid close attention by the governments and political parties . Lenin and Gramsci as Marxist pioneers, as the Eastern and Western Marxists, the symbolic figure, the leadership of Lenin and Gramsci is also to explore and debate the object to Marxists.In this paper, Marxism is the guidance , using vertical analysis, horizontal comparison, summarized research methods, drawing on philosophy, political science, history, sociology, military science and other related subjects researches. To the late 19th and early 20th century development of the time as the background, combined with Russia, and Italy's social and economic background, focuses on the leadership thought of Lenin and Gramsci.analysis of differences and similarities between the two points. In the new international situation, the paper analysis the issues related to the leadership consolidation of the proletariat. This paper is divided into three parts: First, the common ideas shared by Lenin and Gramsci. This section mainly from the three-pronged approach, first, the same age. From the late 19th century to the half of the 20th century, the world's economic, social and status of the proletarian movement. Second, the leadership's insistence and attention. Leadership is to determine the key to the success of the revolutionary cause, we must stick to the revolutionary leadership. Third, the process of fighting for the leadership, we must pay attention to the party and the people. The party and the masses of the people must rely on the fighting for the leadership of the proletariat. Second, the leadership of Lenin and Gramsci's of difference. First, different social backgrounds. The paper described the different basic national conditions of Russia and Italy at that time. Second, philosophical basis. Lenin's political leadership is generated by the historical materialism as the philosophical basis of ideas; Gramsci's thought leadership generated by the practice of philosophy as a philosophical basis. Third, the connotations and characteristics. Lenin's thought leadership focused on the political leadership, Gramsci's thought leadership focus on the cultural and ideological leadership. Fourth, the social access path. Lenin advocated the need for a proletarian party, through the political parties to unite and mobilize the masses to achieve leadership; Gramsci advocated the social role of intellectuals, civil society, to the people through the "common sense" of instilling "new world concept"to achieve leadership . Fifth, the revolutionary strategies. Lenin through violent revolution ( "war of movement") has achieved the victory of October Revolution; Gramsci believed that we should take positional warfare in order to achieve the victory of the proletarian revolution in Italy. Third, the leadership of Lenin and Gramsci's thinking of realistic significance. First, the construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics must stick to the principle that Chinese Communist Party should be the political core. Second, the construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics must stick to the people's power of subject status. Third, the construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics must stick to Marxist ideological ruling status.