Font Size: a A A

Digestion Of Subject And Multiple Existence

Posted on:2011-01-22Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:D XuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2155360305466902Subject:Fine Arts
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In modern Western philosophy and its cultural framework based on human subjectivity is the supreme value as a starting point and theoretical pre-determine the process of human change the world of all acts. "Subjectivity" in by the spirit of the only from Descartes to Kant's "human nature legislation" the continuing escalation in the early 20th century peak. The subject is considered to have free self-will, can recognize and grasp the essence of the world, is independent, free and rational entity, is the master of the world, can follow their own interests and the will to use and transform the world. In this metaphysics of subjectivity based on "the human body and exist as a basis for their own purposes in the human world of organized existence of each of those provisions of the true position; as the existence of those objects, only people their representation in place, they are the real existence. subjectivity and humanitarian value for the physical evaluation is to help achieve its capacity of human nature, advantages and disadvantages in terms of human." were the main provisions of the macro into a common phase, with a certain universal norm, it forced a specific definition of the individual subject to universal truth, the law of value and behavior. This constitutes the core values of modernism.As a targeted social critical theory, post-modernism on the core value of modernism "as a human subject" for criticism, it considers the so-called universal, in fact, were the main phase of a male-dominated discourse. At the same time, feminists have discovered the facts on the women themselves:the women in the past have been caught in the long run the macro in the main men in politics. In "as the male subject" of criticism, postmodernism and feminism are the same, the former is critical to provide the philosophical basis for the latter. But on the other hand, they both then there are differences, because all the efforts of post-modernism to the subject and the center of digestion, whereas feminism is trying to fight or rebuild their own subjectivity.Postmodern perspective more and more diversified in different geographical exploration and cultural tours, as the starting point of another culture's Eastern philosophy, during which implies a unique alternative perspective. Eastern philosophy Western philosophy has a different way of thinking, when Western philosophy trying to qualify as comprehensive as possible to explain a concept, the Eastern philosophy is trying to abandon all those qualified to be the most essential meaning. The postmodern feminist subjectivity and dispute, as the source of the Taoist philosophy of Oriental thought implies a speculative concern. I in "the moral" which sets out the beginning:they can be described by the language of truth, not truth. He denied the use of language while the language itself, so that truth can create a channel into the infinite, he will undoubtedly bring us to a break and go beyond all languages limit the system empty world, so since we can far from the date on the entire history of the truth constitute a huge system, so easy to make immediate intervention and determine the unique time and space. Similarly, when we turned to the contemplation of the truth I caused a strong argument that the "subject", it will be easily found:When a subject is recognized as the main event, it no longer is the real subject, and it is all those related to the subject's independence, unity, freedom is no longer relevant. That is truly free, from the main criticism is the absence of the subject. Lacan saw this, he thus said:Women do not exist.So we can assume that such a vision:a single subject of digestion just means the original non-dominant position in the "other" true liberation-of course provided that they do not immediately separate a new subject-and no longer on which he himself again subject of the remodeling, but simply does not exist Benhabib calls "self-unity" and this "loss of self-unity" because the original subject that had been digested At this time, whether the subject has been deconstructed, or relative to the original subject that he who is no longer the principal or his person, so no longer need to "subject" associated with "identity", nor the " self-unity "of the classification and definition. This is perhaps a kind of liberation.
Keywords/Search Tags:Digestion
PDF Full Text Request
Related items