"Warring States" And "Historical Records" Policymakers Image Comparative Study

Advisors, is accompanied by the Warring States flames and smoke rise of a special class. Warring States policymakers have in a special historical period, their words and deeds also unique. Policymakers have in the day, they would be treated as a group Yingyinggougou, perfidious shameless in contempt. They seeking fame and wealth as their ideal life, and North Korea for Tianshi Lang, the emperor screen Deng Tong, yesterday also worry about the poor languish, traveled ravines, and today will be light Qiu fat horse. This group of life in troubled times, longer troubled times, inevitable because of the limitations of its own, with the unity of the community and gradually die out.The deeds of policymakers to preserve a large number featuring Liu Xiang in the "war policy" and Sima Qian's "Records of the Historian". "Zhanguoce" the author of this paper is that the Warring States by the Political Strategists. The book records policymakers appear in the deeds of the same circumstances, there are in fact quite different. In this paper, in the Study of the image of the difference between the two advisors on the basis of the records of two different reasons, with a view to a new perspective and new ideas under the guidance of hope from the moral and historical contributions to policymakers on a fair evaluation.This paper is divided into three chapters. For the research part of the first chapter. Through three aspects of the comparative study of the works policymakers differences. I believe that: Compared with the "war policy", "Historical Records" of all the advisers added, "then the poor", most of them before the successful experience difficulties, but indomitable spirit of character makes them ultimately successful. After the success of the policymakers have a strong sense of revenge, this is unyielding on the fate of a protest. They treat the cause of the hard-won more firmly dedicated to lobbying as the cause of life, instead of "war policy" simply the pursuit of interests. Warring States policymakers with their wisdom, gallop on the political stage, but their outcome is bleak unsatisfactory.Chapter II on part of the book with policymakers and for different reasons. This chapter is divided into three sections:Section I, from the book of the historical background and experience the life of the individual authors study. As policymakers speak of the "Warring States", whether from the political, economic, ideological or cultural context, it carries the characteristics of chaos in the society in a big transition period of reform. Contrast, the "Historical Records" is produced in a unified time, all aspects of society towards a unified direction. The most important thing is, the book's author writing with obvious personal life and deeds of the brand. Sima Qian suffered by the plight of his creative when making more prominent policymakers are enduring humiliation, and ultimately tenacious struggle, the success of the side.Section II, the discussion of the "Warring States" the overall trends of thought. In general, under the guidance of ideological tendencies, "Zhanguoce'"s advisors, advocating political scheming, scheming seen as a magic weapon is the power of infinite; good respected the "odd strategy," Qiao to argue that the "Sage's" brazenly the pursuit of fame and fortune as the goal of life, and stressed the need to size up the situation, the "situation" as the "Pepsi long."Section III, on "Historical Records" on the "war policy" ideological tendency of neat. Sima Qian not only choose to absorb the "Warring States" ethos, more importantly, the thrust of the change, bring it into the "Historical Records" and "Fu-Ti Tang, another has Shishi, a meritorious service in the world" to the overall proposal, pay attention Mining policymakers on the progress, such as a wisdom. Objective view of human nature "profit" levels, and calls upon and yearning for the good of human natureChapter III, although the "war policy" in "Historical Records" record policymakers authenticity of the acts were mixed, with the advisers are the author's personal feelings color, they will certainly with the author of the limitations of the times. Su Qin representatives policymakers, in the Yi, and other times has been as negative materials to be blamed. A new era, brought us new ways of thinking and new research perspective, but also so that we can stand in an objective perspective to evaluate the historical figures. Different stand, viewpoint and method, will arrive at diametrically opposite conclusions. If the moral evaluation of advisors, for their values of life, we have to look at and learn from dialectical if judged from a political perspective, the policymakers is indeed indelible contributions for their social and historical development has made great contribution. How to correctly evaluate the policymakers in our country the merits and demerits of ancient society, gains and losses, right and wrong, how can we criticize the relationship between the inheritance of ancient wisdom and heritage.