Analysis On Clinical Efficacy Of The Traction With Cervical Spine Tuina On The Treatment For Nerve Root Type Cervical Spondylosis

Objective:Analysis of traction in supine position and sitting on the effect of treatment of cervical disease and summarizes the outstanding issues, while observing the supine traction for the treatment of nerve root type cervical spondylosis clinical efficacy.Research Methods:1.To collect and collate the past decade traction for the treatment of cervical spondylosis research data, and analyze summary.2. Select 50 patients from October 2008 to November 2009 in rehabilitation hospital rehabilitation wards of Daqing City, who suffer from the nerve root type cervical spondylosis, and patients were randomly divided into treatment group 25 cases and the control group 25 cases. The treated group used Supine traction as the main combination therapy, the control group used seat traction mainly, comparative efficacy after treatment in two.Results:Before treatment, all the indicators observed is no significant difference between the significance (P>0.05). After treatment, the treatment group and control group could significantly improve the nerve root type cervical spondylosis clinical symptoms, and the total effective rate of Supine traction was 100%, sitting traction control group was 90.0%, the overall effect of the same, but The x2 test, P>0.05, there is no significant difference; and markedly effective rate between the treatment group 86.3% vs 55%, P<0.05, significant difference in the treatment group is better than the control group. There are differences (P<0.05); treated and control groups before and after treatment comparison and efficacy of a single symptom total score of two groups of symptoms compared to change the contrast and the curvature, by t test, all P<0.05, significant difference. The results showed that the markedly effective rate in treatment group, compared before and after the effect of the single symptoms and symptom groups and the curvature change in terms of total points better than the control group.Conclusion:Supine traction in line with anatomical characteristics of the neck and can be under the physiological curvature of the neck in patients with various changes to facilitate adjustment of traction lines, more conducive to the recovery in patients with cervical physiological curvature of the brain a better blood supply, neck, shoulder, back and soft tissue and body can be fully stretch to relax, supine intermittent traction homeopathic bit more conducive to the nerve root type cervical spondylosis treated better than supine traction in treatment of intermittent functional site of nerve root type cervical spondylosis.