| [Objective]To observe the electro-acupuncture therapy Jiaji ordinary filiform needle therapy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (Lumbarintervertebraldiseprotrusion,LIDP ) differences in clinical efficacy,to explore its therapeutic mechanism LIDP designed by observing the electro-acupuncture treatment Jiaji LIDP clinical efficacy and the improvement of pain,with a view to a certain extent on the clinical treatment of the guiding role.[Methods]years 2007 -2008 in our hospital out-patient treatment of 63 cases of LIDP treatment group were randomly divided into 32 cases and 31 cases of the control group for comparison.The treatment group selected vertebral lesion(if multiple vertebral lesions were the most re-center) and up and down both sides of the vertebral body of a total of three pairs of Jiaji with licensing Huatuo 2.5-3 inch stainless steel needle into the acupuncture needle,acupuncture needle at the spine side oblique direction,a gas will be about 3 wire connection,selection of sparse wave,current local muscle appeared to beat rhythm,the patient can tolerate for the degree.30 minutes each treatment,10 times for 1 course,rest on the 3rd,two courses of treatment were observed.Control group with reference to "acupuncture" select Shenshu xue,Da chang shu,Zhi bian,Huan tiao,Cheng fu,Yin men, Wei zhong,Yang ling quan,treatment with the treatment group.The main observation during treatment of patients with signs and symptoms and function,clinical efficacy.According to Chinese medicine treatment LIDP clinical guidelines and "common diseases to determine the diagnosis and efficacy of(standard)," Comprehensive Assessment of the use of pain rating scale based on low back pain patients in two groups of symptoms,life,work capacity,signs score,integrated evaluation before and after treatment to improve the situation,to make an accurate assessment of the comparison between the two groups in parallel.[Results]Electro-acupuncture treatment group(A) Clinical Efficacy:53.1% cure rate,markedly effective rate of 81.3 percent,the total effective rate 93.8%.Cents for the control group(B) clinical efficacy:32.3%cure rate, markedly effective rate of 58.1%,the total effective rate 87.1%.The cure rate comparison between the two groups:A than B(P < 0.01), electro-acupuncture treatment group was significantly better than for the control group cents,statistically significant differences.Markedly effective rate:A more than B(P<0.01),electro-acupuncture treatment group was significantly better than for the control group cents,statistically significant differences.Comparison of the total effective rate:A more than B(P < 0.05),Electroacupuncture for the treatment group cents better than the control group,statistically significant differences.Electro-acupuncture treatment group(A) Comprehensive pain points before and after treatment difference:symptom score difference:7.53±2.07,signs point difference: 7.75±2.14.Cents for the control group(B) the comprehensive integration of pain before and after treatment difference:symptom score difference:5.93±2.40,signs point difference:6.03±2.45.Symptom score difference between the two groups compared:A than B(P <0.01),electro-acupuncture treatment group was significantly better than for the control group cents, statistically significant differences.Comparison of signs points difference:A than B(P <0.01),electro-acupuncture treatment group was significantly better than for the control group cents,statistically significant differences.[Conclusion]①LIDP electro-acupuncture in improving the treatment of patients with symptoms and signs and restore its function was significantly better than traditional acupuncture needle.②Jiaji Electro-acupuncture treatment of bulging LIDP to highlight the type of patients as the main indication.
|
PDF Full Text Request