A Clinical Research Of Rapid Teatment Program In Treating The Type A Influenza Upper Respiratory Infection

Objective: The aim of study was to sum up a rapid treatment programabout influenza A in the foudation of achieving good results of antiinfluenza A vitro experiment about tanreqing and Ribavirin injection andbingyanqing I respectively .Now through quickly detect influenza A patientsto observe the clinical effection by using tanreqing and Ribavirininjection and bingyanqing I together.Method: Influenza borderline cases were collected from ShenZhenHospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, then detecting them with themethod of ELISA. 80 cases were screened and randomly classified routinetherapeutic group and control group. Each group were respectively 40 cases.Therapeutic groups were treated with Tanreqing,Ribavirin injection andBingyanqing I,while control groups were treated with Ribavirininjection. We progressed 2 days clinical observation.Result: The total evaluation on the basis of symptom,objective sign,hemogram displayed: 25 cases were heal, 5 Cases were excellence, 5 cases wereutility, 5 cases were ineffective in therapeutic group, the total effectivepower was 87.5%;but 12 cases were heal, 8 cases were excellence, 5 cases wereutility, 15 cases were ineffective in control group, the total effectivepower was 62.5%. The total effective power of therapeutic group wereobviously higher than the control group. There was a significant statisticaldifference (P＜0.01).Two groups of the age,sex,pathogenetic conditionlevel were no difference (P＞0.05) ;35 cases with febrile and 34 cases withcough were improving within 2 days in therapeutic group, while 20 cases withfebrile and 23 cases with cough were improving within 2 days in contralgroup. On the whole, the relieving time of clinical symptom of therapeuticgroup was shorter than the control group. There was a significantstatistical difference (P＜0.05) . According to score standard, the twogroups were no statistical difference (P＞0.05) in aspect of febrile and cough. After 2 days, therapeutic group post-treatment surpassed ownpre-treatment (P＜0.01) .And we found score of therapeutic group weresuperior to control group ,There was a significant statistical differenceP＜0.05).Conclusion: According to the above results of clinical observation.Wecan draw the following conclusions:(1)The total efficiency is obviouslyhigher than control group to apply qucikly treatment program, One-time curerate is 50%, the therapeutic effect is positive. (2)The clinical resultsshow:The therapeutic group is shorter than control group in the time offever and cough improvment. (3)In the course of the study we found that typeA influenza patients almost were wenduxing in differentiation, but we needto further dicuss if the wenduxing is the main type of syndrome.