Faun Calls For Asia In The Spring Grazing

The paper is based on the theory of ecology and related literary theories such as Ecological Literature and Art,Ecological Aesthetics and Comparative Literature and so on.It is also the new original creation comparative research on Ecological Literature between the two world famous writers:Guo Xuebo, who is a typical ecology novelist of the Comparative Literature and Aitmatov, who is a famous writer of the former Soviet Union (The Kyrgyzstan States). From the perspectives of the position of ecology, the demands of Aesthetics and creation practice and purposes, we can study the comparative research on Ecological Literature of the two writers. Generally speaking,there are five parts in the paper.The introduction gives us a brief look at the background,the Status Quo of the Ecological Novel,which shows the necessaries and importance of the modern Ecological criticism of the two authors and also demonstrates the parallel study of the Comparative Literature.First of all, the first chapter illustrates the position of ecology of both writers respectively.Due to the various cultural contexts, they represents the different demands of ecology. On one hand, Guo Xuebo emphasizes on the protection of the independence and diversity of ecology civilizations,which involves the Post-modern meaning of Ecology. On the other hand, Aitmatov represents the deep Ecology Theory,he tries to concern and solve the crises of Ecology within the thousands years of the human history throughout the world. Next, there are different comparisons of demands of Ecology between Guo Xuebo and Aitmatov in the second chapter.From the five perspectives of the Debris of Civilization, the Reversion of Gods, the Mysterious Genius, the Lonely Savior and the Space Ring,we will know the spirit and pursuits of both authors.Because they both try to interrogate and recuperate the relationship between human and nature and the different writing resources with regional features, they both show the unique Aesthetics style respectively. Guo Xuebo prefers to the boorish and rough writing style,rather than the graceful and restrained way of Aitmatov.Furthermore, from the third chapter, we can know that the origin and misunderstandings of both writers on the issue of Ecological Literature with a unique style of Guo Xuebo and Aitmatov.Because of the age characters,cultural context and ethnic recognition,they both pursuit the art of the Ecological Novel. However, the root fracture and obstruction of the Ecological Literature leads to the wrong over-involved and non-mainstream writing style.To sum up, the conclusion with Guo Xuebo and Aitmatov's Ecological Success and Failure in Minority Areas, based on thinking how Eco novels go further.