Non-Rationality Factor In Scientific Nationality Research

The question of scientific rationality question is the products together with the modern science. When Galileo "unified the experimental technique and the induction method and mathematics deduction method" to establish modern-time science, science had faced the question of rationality So how can the theary be accepred? In face of attacks from religion and the philosophy field , as a scientist Galileo naturally would defend for the scientific rationality :1,The science is experiencable;2,The science is the logicable .It is just the core function of the modern west philosophy and 19th century form the real diagnosis to discuss the philosophy, defer to the experience and the logical frame which Galileo establishes to the scientific rationality to carry on the philosophy stratification plane the proof. But, regardless of is from flute Cull, Locker after Leibniz, Hume to the conde philosophy, Comte, a Mach real diagnosis discusses the philosophy, is restricted in the historical condition, all has not been able to use the experience and the logical establishment merely the complete scientific rational theory. The conde finally can not but use the ultra experience "the thing-in-itself' to take the scientific rational final strut;Mach then lost in "the phenomenon" and fell into the instrumentalism.In 20th century, together with the western philosophy linguistics to change, and the establishment of the theory of relativity and the quantum theory as the prop of "the new physics", in addition Russell and content root Stan forge "the logic analysis theory" this ready-made tool, arises at the historic moment the logic empiricism finally built the Gallie slightly scientific rational theory building in the predecessor philosophy achievement foundation;Science establishment in merely by experience and above logical constitution foundation. But this rational theory experience and logical making absolute. Deying completely the science the actual existence non-logic and the non- experience content, it has repelled the non- rationality. Therefore from has from encountered the intense criticism from the very beginning. Until 60's,The historical principle finally caused it to suffer the ruinous attack but the datetendency micro. But historical principle to in science non- logic, The non- experience factor infinite exaggeration but moves towards another extreme, caused the science to fall into completely in the non- rationalism. 60,,70 ages although carried on to the scientific rational question have been widespread but the thorough discussion, but have not reached the consistent view throughout. Scientific rational question unresolved, after 80's, along with after modern ideological trend rapid development, along with to "rationality" the explanation, setting at variance defines again, the science has obtained another rationality, but the science rationality is by the science and the religion, the myth and the literary criticism and so on is similarly objective, similarly really for price. Therefore, after it said the modernism tendency had defended the scientific rationality, rather to say it has cancelled the scientific rationality thoroughly.regardless of is the logic empiricism, the historical principle and the latter modernism, they all have promulgated science certain characteristics from the different side. But they respectively discovred the feather of the scientific nature all from varying angles .The development of scientific rational in nearly a century as well as all sorts of current signs all indicated that, to defend the science of rationality, we must return to the dialectical philosophy. , that is to say ,the scientific rational theory constructs must follow the dialectical philosophy the principle, the tool rationality and the value rational unification, the rationality and the non- rational unification. Science and humanities unification. ,...