General Secretary Xi Jinping’s series of important expositions emphasized the acceleration of the construction of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics.As an important part of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics,the proposition of the construction of Chinese management science has also attracted great attention and eager discussion from the academic community,and relevant research results have been successively.The current construction of Chinese management science that is rooted in Chinese soil,suitable for Chinese situations,and highlights Chinese characteristics not only has its practical foundation,but also has historical inevitability and practical necessity.It is not only an inevitable requirement for the revival of traditional culture to achieve its creative transformation and innovative development,is also a realistic choice to deal with the particularity and limitations of western management theories.Many achievements in the current academic circles either focus on the systematic investigation of the development and evolution of China’s management disciplines,management thoughts and management practices in stages,but fail to directly and fully discuss the ideological issues of Chinese management science;or focus on the contemporary certainty.However,it is lacking in the long-term investigation of the time dimension and the analytical perspective of the historical level,and the comparative research in different periods is still weak.In fact,the construction of Chinese management is not only a contemporary proposition,but also a historical proposition.In modern times,management science was introduced into China as an imported product in the eastward spread of Western learning.In the process of localizing research and application of Western management theories based on China’s national conditions,Chinese people gradually developed their own demands for independent academic development.Since the reform and opening up,With the continuous reform of the economic management system,the resumption of the dissemination of Western management and the resumption of domestic management academic research,the academic circles have presented a series of ideas and theoretical achievements around why and how to build Chinese management.Since the new century,the vigorous development of Chinese management thought construction is a historical necessity after my country’s management practice has continuously achieved results and realized the long-term accumulation of management academics.In view of this,this paper conducts a holistic review and systematic investigation of the construction thought of Chinese management and its development and evolution since modern times.It should be pointed out that management includes multiple branches such as enterprise management and administrative management.In addition to the general significance of the Chinese management construction thought,this paper is also based on the richness of research results,the adequacy of historical materials and the research Based on the feasibility,the Chinese enterprise management and Chinese administrative management construction ideas in the branch fields are selected to carry out research in various periods,so as to achieve both generality and specificity,universality and particularity,and grasp the basis of "specific" exploration In fact,it also helps to form a deeper understanding of "general".In addition,the "Chinese management science" discussed in this article does not refer to Chinese management thought,Chinese management practice,Chinese management discipline or Chinese management research,but focuses on the research object of Chinese management thought construction.Carry out a systematic investigation around the ideological understanding formed by the academic circles on why and how to construct Chinese management since modern times,and specifically settle on the definition of concepts,research subjects,research objects,research purposes,research methods,research characteristics and theories In-depth analysis of the system etc.In a nutshell,this paper attempts to discuss three main issues: the first level is to comprehensively sort out the Chinese management thought that has emerged and formed since modern times,and analyze its main characteristics,theoretical contributions,academic consensus and theoretical differences;the second level The third level is to systematically investigate the evolution trajectory and internal logic of the construction of Chinese management thought in different stages of development since modern times,revealing a relatively complete picture of dynamic evolution;the third level is to try to discuss the requirements for the construction of Chinese management standards,summarizing the experience and enlightenment in the construction of Chinese management since modern times,in order to provide historical reference for the construction and development of contemporary Chinese management.According to the time context,this article systematically sorts out the construction thought and evolution process of Chinese management since modern times.The main content can be divided into five parts.The first chapter mainly introduces the basic contents such as the reasons for choosing the topic,research significance,research objects,research methods,literature reviews,research ideas and research characteristics.The historical division of three periods in the evolution of management construction thought.The second chapter mainly examines the first period of the evolution of Chinese management thought: the germination period(1916-1949).In the modern period,there was a lack of research on the construction of Chinese management in a general sense,mainly because of the demand for the independent development of domestic academics under the background of the introduction and localization of enterprise management theory and the introduction and localization of administrative management theory.On the one hand,the introduction,dissemination and learning of Western management science provides an important theoretical reference for the construction of the Chinese management theory system;on the other hand,the localization of Chinese people’s adaptation and adaptation of Western management theory based on their own national conditions provides a practical basis.Therefore,modern scholars with theoretical consciousness and autonomy have gradually sprouted the appeal of constructing Chinese scientific management law and Chinese administrative science.In addition,during this period,there were still academic disputes about the generality of scientific management law and the particularity of Chinese scientific management law,the particularity of administrative practice and the universality of administrative principles.It laid the ideological foundation for further contemporary research.The third chapter focuses on the second period of the evolution of Chinese management thought: the rising period(1949-1996).This period can be specifically divided into two stages: 1949-1977 and 1978-1996.In 1949-1977,after the founding of New China,under the influence of actively carrying out socialist economic construction and the Soviet Union’s economic management model,my country’s From the initial "taking Su as a teacher" to "taking Su as a mirror",to independently explore the enterprise management mode suitable for China’s national conditions,and it is mainly manifested in the beneficial exploration of Chinese socialist enterprise management.From the comparison between China and the Soviet Union,Chinese enterprise management is not a derivative of the Soviet Union’s management model.There are differences between the two in terms of research methods,research objects,research content and implementation paths.From 1978 to 1996,different from the modern period,in addition to further breakthroughs in the construction of Chinese business management and Chinese administrative management in the branch field,the research on the construction of Chinese management in a general sense also ushered in an opportunity for development.The academic circle has formed the preliminary research results of Chinese business management,Chinese administrative management and Chinese management in terms of concept explanation,research subject,research object,research purpose,research method and theoretical system.In addition,during this period,there was a heated theoretical debate on how to deal with the universality and specificity of management theory,and a basic consensus was formed on the application boundary of management at the application level,and whether management was universal at the theoretical level.Still debated.It also leads to the issue of whether management science has national and class characteristics,whether the proposition of Chinese management science construction is valid,and how much innovation is achieved in theoretical system and research paradigm,which also become the ideological prelude for further discussion in the next stage.The fourth chapter mainly discusses the third period of the evolution of Chinese management thought: the development period(1997-present).Based on the fertile soil of Chinese management practice and the continuous growth of Chinese management academics,the academic circles have built propositions around Chinese business management,Chinese administrative management,and Chinese management in terms of concept definition,research subject,research standpoint,research object,research purpose,Research methods,research characteristics,and theoretical systems were discussed in depth,and progress was made in both research breadth and theoretical depth compared with the previous two periods.In addition,as a natural extension of the debate on the universality and particularity of management theory in the previous stage,there has been an ideological confrontation between borrowing from the Western paradigm and establishing a local paradigm on the issue of theoretical systems in this period,and whether the paradigm shift is possible and feasible.Controversy,and produced a certain consensus and representative Chinese management theory system.From the perspective of the comparison between China and the West,Western management science has developed along with European and American capitalist economic management practices,and contains a certain ideological tendency;Chinese management science is based on the research object of socialist management practice with Chinese characteristics,and contains people-centered research position.In terms of research paradigm,Chinese management science does not completely follow the theoretical system of Western management science,but adheres to the guidance of Marxism,uses the methodology of dialectical materialism and historical materialism,absorbs the beneficial results of Western management paradigm,and embarks on a path.The path of two-way integration of domestic practice and local culture is a useful attempt to build a Chinese paradigm.It also further leads to the topic of the times that Chinese management science needs to take into account both locality and universality in order to improve the international discourse power.The fifth chapter is the overall investigation of the construction thought of Chinese management.First of all,it focuses on the evolution track of the construction thought of Chinese management since modern times,and further explores the internal logic of the evolution of the construction thought on this basis.Secondly,statistical analysis is carried out on the relevant concepts of Chinese management to reveal the evolution trend of conceptual terms in different periods,and an attempt is made to discuss the construction standards of Chinese management.Finally,further explore the future development direction of Chinese management,and provide useful enlightenment for accelerating the construction of Chinese management.In general,the main conclusions of this paper are as follows:(1)The exploration of the construction of Chinese management since modern times was not accomplished overnight,but a process of thought accumulation,practical evolution and academic accumulation over a long period of time.In the process of independent creation,it shows a development track from scratch,from shallow to deep,step by step.(2)There have been long-term academic disputes about the construction proposition of Chinese management science,which is related to the generality and particularity of management science.At present,although there are still debates in the academic circles about the generality and particularity of management and the issues it extends,it has become a form of academic circles to overcome such theoretical differences and face the reality to conduct practical research on Chinese management practice and Chinese management theory.basic consensus.(3)Attempts to explore the construction standards of Chinese management: In terms of the subject of research,it is necessary to cooperate with Chinese theorists and practitioners,and to encourage the participation of overseas Chinese and non-Chinese scholars.In terms of research objects,on the one hand,it is necessary to pay attention to management phenomena and management issues that have commonality with Western countries;management theory.In terms of research purposes,it should focus on summarizing general management laws,extracting Chinese management theories,solving Chinese management problems,guiding Chinese management practices,and contributing to the development of world management.In terms of research methods,adhere to the guidance of Marxism,pay attention to the integration of ancient and modern times,the integration of Chinese and Western,and innovate research methods in the interaction between management theory and management practice.In terms of research characteristics,it pays attention to the unity of particularity and universality,and is both systematic and innovative,thus forming a theoretical system with internal logic and self-consistency. |