Adaptive Governance:the Transformation Of Township Governance And Its Practical Logic

The modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity has profoundly affected the logic of grassroots governance.In the context of the country’s overall towards modernization,the central government has begun to adjust the configuration structure of administrative power,and strengthens the control of grassroots governance through a series of measures such as refined management systems,technical assessment methods,and dense supervision and accountability.Try to incorporate grassroots governance into a more standardized institutional framework to fit the basic goals of the grass-roots governance system and governance capacity.The operation of the township governments is a concrete form of national governance,and it is also an inevitable link for the relationship between the country and society.In the new era,its operating logic has also changed significantly.This study is based on the situation-behavioral perspective,and focuses on studying the characteristics and practical logic of ordinary agricultural towns and towns in the central and western regions.Pay attention to the internal autonomy and adaptive behavior of the township governments under the situation of multiple pressure governance.Further understand the initiative of grass-roots government organizations,that is,in the background of the new era,we can adapt to the complex governance environment and pressure through proactively;enrich and expand the theory of adaptability governance theory in the field of grass-roots governance field Its possibility conditions.Studies have found that under the background of grass-roots governance transformation,various governance tasks and pressures of governance have continued to swell,and it is increasingly beyond the bearing capacity of the grass-roots conventional governance system.At the same time,the increasingly detailed indicators,specifications,and supervision and assessment systems formulated by the superior government objectively increased the amount of tasks at the grassroots level objectively,and the launch of the political mobilization mechanism further increased the difficulty of task completion.As a result,grass-roots organizations are facing the governance situation of "multi-central work".The township governments with limited governance resources In order to respond to the governance dilemma brought about by the generalization of the center of the center,through the adjustment of the governance mechanism in specific practice,a set of "adaptive governance" model has been formed,thereby reaching The adaptation and balance between local government limited resources and mission environmental complexity.Specifically,the adaptive governance process of the township governments under the background of multi-center work is mainly reflected in the following four aspects:The first is to adjust upwards.The township government has built the flexible space for the action to choose by adopting a differential order execution strategy with the superior.In the process of transformation of grass-roots governance,the township government is facing more and more up-to-bottom "central tasks" commission.Under the new governance situation of sinking and governance capabilities,the S town is based on task incentives and incentives and incentives and incentives.The difference in stress attributes arranges the orderly work order of the superior tasks,and the resource allocation of the characteristics of different task attributes is performed to achieve the purpose of alleviating policy pressure.The second is to integrate inward.The township government re-enables the restructuring of the structure of the township and re-creates a flexible policy execution subject.By breaking the original system of division of power and responsibilities and the configuration of power configuration,the nature and model of the internal work of the government’s administrative system were re-planned.The township and township level is a complete organizational system.Based on the division of labor,the three levels have formed a hierarchical operating mechanism for upper-level overall scheduling,middle-level organization implementation and underlying organization.As a result,the township government has achieved the integration of internal organization,personnel and resources through organizational restructuring methods.The third is to mobilize internal.The township government can mobilize the enthusiasm of the cadres within the system by building the dual incentive mechanism of internal cadres,thereby alleviating the tension between governance pressure and lack of governance resources.During the implementation of the policy,the township governments used their autonomous space to develop two mechanisms: external incentives and endogenous incentives based on the dual working motivation of cadres’ external needs and internal needs.The enthusiasm of internal cadres to activate the work enthusiasm of internal cadres through the internal motivation of external incentives and work embedding and value reconstruction through manufacturing flow and political opportunities.The fourth is to adjust downward.The township government achieves the goal of relieving under pressure by building a community of rural responsibility.In the process of interacting with village cadres,the township governments have continuously enriched policy governance tools through the use of their own institutional resources and social resources to achieve the absorption and mobilization of village cadres.For the township governments,the governance tasks in the system must eventually be implemented and implemented at the first level of the village.Essence Through the construction of a community of responsibility,the stability and continuity of policy mobilization have been promoted.The process of adaptability governance in towns and towns,on the one hand,reflects the ability to adapt and adjust the grass-roots party and government systems to respond to complex environments.It can strengthen its own administrative effectiveness through organizational adjustment and the operation of informal systems,and then cope with the needs of complex governance;It reflects the inevitability and necessity of informal governance in the field of grassroots governance.Therefore,in the process of strengthening standardization,institutionalization,and legalization of grassroots governance modernization,it should also further explore and think about how to give grass-roots organization autonomy and flexibility space.