Study On The Transformation Of Grassroots Governance In The "Three-Village" Area In The Process Of Urbanization

Grassroots governance is experiencing a wave of urbanization and industrialization.In the process of urban-rural transition,the "government problem" in rural areas includes more than just "extraction","input",and "management" to "governance." In a sense,it represents a "up-bottom" governance value orientation.In this great change that hasn’t happened in a century,the governance space,rules,and resources of the grass-roots society have undergone a "bottom-up" field transformation.So can we find a representative region to take a glimpse of the transformation of governance that China’s grassroots society is facing? Can the changes in the relationship between "state" and society be reflected in more detailed and microscopic governance experience? How to present a richer and more diversified transformation in the grass-roots governance unit? This is the main concern of this article.Through empirical research on the "Three-Village"(urban villages,suburban villages,and garden villages)areas,it is found that they are above the node of the "township-city" change,which has produced many governance tensions from "none" to "appearance".The grass-roots governance machines have adapted to the structural field transformation and evolved a unique "new normalization" governance pattern in the transitional area of "Three-Village".For example,the third chapter focuses on the investigation of grid-based governance,and the "integral" unitary structure of traditional rural units has begun to shift to co-governance of multiple subjects.Some governance entities have begun to restructure and involve multiple parties.For example,the " property-to-be" model plays a role of "institution-life" in the transitional governance unit.At the same time,"overall-domination" has evolved into a refined governance,and a technical governance mechanism has emerged."Listing" is a representative practice.On the one hand,the "Three-Village" field has demonstrated significant policy value evidence,but it also faces practicality adapt to the dilemma of asynchronous.Explicit interest has always been the fundamental element of activating social governance.Demolition and collection activities in the process of urbanization and industrialization have restructured local governance,re-observing its distribution order,and found that "distribution" and "governance" have co-existed as games two orientations: "weak governance and strong distribution" and "strong governance and weak distribution".In addition to discussions on governance organization,system,and order,the sixth chapter returns to the subject of governance.After comparing the villages of different socioeconomic levels in the east,middle,and west,the "cadre interaction" is focused on the "transition of governance".The structure of "cadres-masses" analyzes its three orientations: modern administration,traditional maintenance,and transitional reconstruction.The author believes that to re-examine the issue of "governance transformation" at the grassroots level,we should go deep into the field of practical experience.On the one hand,we need to understand the overall appearance of the governance of a village community in a panoramic manner,so as to capture the more micro-dynamic mechanism in social transformation.On the other hand,a multi-region comparison of the horizontal dimension is needed,which is also a classic way to deepen the cognitive case."China in the Village" has always been an important research perspective in sociological research.From the micro to the macro,we should continue to understand,interpret and interpret the most authentic and fastest-growing grass-roots experience in order to recognize the changes in the great chinese society.The core observation of "grass-roots governance" research is "good governance".We should always grasp the pulse of social front-line changes and adhere to the "people-oriented" caring spirit in order to cooperate towards good governance from the bottom up.