| County governance is the most important unit of governance in the national governance system,which is related to the political stability and people’s life improvement.In history,China’s county-level governments have experienced the dominant government,the omnipotent government,economic development government and rule of law government.Under different types of government structure,there are significant differences in positioning of government functions and behavior patterns.As an important governance paradigm of the type of developmental government and rule of law government,administrative law enforcement has become more important in current county governance.In recent years,with the deep propel of the institutions reform of the party and state,the municipal and county-level governments have been given a great deal of power in administrative licensing and administrative law enforcement.In this process,strengthen the executive functions of municipal and county governments,improve administration of law enforcement by municipal and county governments,and promote comprehensive law enforcement have become an important direction for promoting reform of the county administrative law enforcement system.At the same time,the problems of various "illegal excess" and the government’s powers to enforce the law arbitrarily in the real social governance,highlights the urgency of administrative law enforcement system reform.Promoting county-level administrative law enforcement reform is an important choice to change the county governance model,From the perspective of mutual integration of public administration and administrative law,this paper uses literature research,normative research,comparative research and empirical research methods to analyze county administrative law enforcement reform social scene,construct the framework of county administrative law enforcement which should follow the administrative law theory and public management theory.Then,from the perspective of historical analysis,we explore the experience of China’s traditional county-level governance paradigm and the modern county-level political organization structure change,function transformation logic,and divide the logical approach according to the type of county government,explore developmental government,profitable brokerage system,responsibility The logical starting point and framework structure for the operation of the county administrative enforcement system under the isomorphic system.At the practical level,three different types of counties are selected as analytical samples to explore the county-level administrative law enforcement leadership system reform,functional adjustment,institutional restructuring and operational mechanism transformation,summarize the restriction factor,realistic predicament behind the Institutional reform changes,and introduce typical case analysis.Widespread formal external-ism administrative law enforcement paradigm of administrative law enforcement in different types of counties.The operation logic of these organized informal institutions eliminate substantial authority of the rule of law has become the biggest challenge to the county administrative law enforcement reform.In view of the bottleneck problem that restricts the reform of the county administrative law enforcement system,to put forward the concept,ideas and path of furtherpromoting reform and innovation.The paper draws the following conclusions: Firstly,through the historical analysis of the organizational structure change and function transformation of county-level political power in China,to expound the characteristics of county-level government in different historical stages,and it is concluded that the county administrative law enforcement system is a governance paradigm of the type of development government and rule of law government.Secondly,combined with the perspective of historical analysis,contemporary county administrative law enforcement reform can learn from the experience of successful governance in ancient grassroots society,and pay attention to echoed with the mass line of the Party.Under the county system,local self-government is main of grassroots social governance in the feudal period of China,but the “Imperial power does not extend to counties” in the form of external-ism also created the social governance structure of “the official and people co-government”.At the same time,the party’s experience in grassroots social governance has always been our precious asset.The Interweaving and complexity of the county local social problems require the rural administrative law enforcement reform to explore the new era of the mode of official and people co-government,party and government co-government,in order to achieve an effective fit between administrative law enforcement,party governance and social autonomy.Thirdly,according to the analysis of three different types of county administrative law enforcement,it can be found that the reform of county administrative law enforcement system should not only focus on functional transformation,institutional restructuring and behavior change,but also the key is to breaking through the law enforcement dilemma arising from the illegal administration of government public power subject.Particularly is the law enforcement into a dilemma caused by the substantive break the law produced by the Organizational informal institutional innovation behavior.it is required to promote the reform of the administrative law enforcement system and mechanisms according to different fields.On the basis of shaping the concept of integral government,rule of law government and service-oriented government,promote the innovation of different types of county-level differentiated administrative law enforcement models,and focus on promoting the reform of the county administrative licensing examination and approval system,the innovation of the administrative law enforcement model in the national environmental environment,and the comprehensive law enforcement in the urban management field.And the county and township vertical law enforcement system innovation.To establish a scientific administrative law enforcement system that adapts to the county’s social governance structure in order to lay a foundation for the county government’s grassroots social governance system and governance capacity modernization. |
