| Can organizations learn through participation in environmental assessment (EA)? This was the central research question of a study that explored the linkages among sustainable development, EA, public participation, and learning. To address this question, the research design involved a comparative case study of two concurrent but geographically separate projects, the Wuskwatim generation station and transmission lines projects (Wuskwatim projects), and the Snap Lake Diamonds Project (Snap Lake project). The Wuskwatim projects involve the construction of a low head dam and three 230 kV transmission line segments in Northern Manitoba, Canada. The Snap Lake Project involves the construction and operation of a diamond mine 220 km northwest of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada, at the headwaters of the Lockhart River drainage system. The EAs of these proposed developments provided multiple opportunities for public (and organizational) involvement in the review, including comments on the scope of the assessment, information requests, and public hearings.; Data collection included participant observation, semi-structured interviews with EA participants, and documentation generated through the course of the reviews. Data were organized using QSR Nvivo, a database software system.; In this dissertation, three key contributions are made. The theoretical framework that draws together a number of separate but related fields of study---communicative action, discursive democracy, transformative learning, organizational learning---is the first contribution. The second is verification that organizations learn through participation in EA. Third, empirical support is presented far the assertion that transformative learning can address change beyond that experienced by the individual, to account for both policy-oriented and organizational learning.; Related to the second contribution, results indicate that participants of EA engage in Teaming on multiple scales. Furthermore, learning outcomes include both instrumental and communicative learning. Instrumental learning included an increased understanding of technical issues and assessment tools, such as information requests. Communicative teaming outcomes included the importance of dialogue as a means of resolving issues and a refinement of strategies For promoting organizational positions. At an organizational scale, teaming by state actors, including government and tribunals, emphasized mechanisms designed to improve performance within existing structures, or "single-loop learning". Public actors, however, identified more outcomes associated with changes to their theory-in-use, designed to change the structure of the EA process, or "double-loop learning". The discussion of learning supports the application of transformative learning as a framework for considering different scales of learning, the third contribution to research.; Findings revealed that individuals and organizations use project specific EA as an opportunity to compel the development and implementation of sustainable initiatives. These findings suggest that higher order learning for sustainability may be occurring through project based EA.; Results also revealed the importance of creating opportunities for discussion and debate as a means of engaging organizations in and encouraging learning through EA. These findings support Habermas' emphasis on dialogue as a means of negotiating political systems. |
