Collaborative Governance On Chinese Athletes’ Education

Since reform and opening up, Chinese athletes’educational development has gone through more than 50 years. Whether it is the school system, management system, investment system, enrollment and employment system, personnel training mode or the reforms have made great progress. In general, educational development of athletes from a highly centralized, learning and training separation, mechanical rigidity of a closed management style is to combine with education, school diversification open governance paradigm shift. Up to now, in addition to social forces to recruit sports reserve personnel, according to statistics, China’s sports reserve talents in training has reached more than six million people, distributed in all kinds of sports schools at all levels of sports organizations like schools and amateur training classes Among the two systems-the education sector and the sports sector management, the two sides are afraid of losing their own interests, not willing to assume responsibility for another system, and then because of the organizational structure is not perfect or imperfect system design and other causes of the conflict continued. Therefore, how to make the various interests within the athletes’ education systems to maximize the interests of the main stakeholders within the system range, achieve win-win is the athletes’ education and development process problems to be solved. Thus providing empirical reference for the construction and improvement of Chinese athletes’ education and collaborative governance mechanisms. Conclusions are as follows:From an empirical perspective on major educational interests of the athletes to identify stakeholders and key stakeholders from the initiative, the importance and urgency of three dimensions score will stakeholders core stakeholder’s intermediate stakeholders and edge stakeholders are classified and presented in a way through the map. Rating Methods multidimensional subdivision and Mitchell classification, this classification method is often used Enterprise Institute, using less in research and education governance among the Stakeholders analysis, educational interests of the athletes and business interests related to the main business-related general the presence of the main big difference, and there are different perspective on research, so this is the innovation of this paper. Based on the athletes’ education among stakeholders empirical analysis demonstrates the feasibility of the theory of governance studies in culture and education among athletes. The results showed that the government, schools, sports personnel training institutions, athletes, teachers are core stakeholders; coaches, parents, school leaders, sports personnel training institution leaders, sports administration, education authorities, employers indirect stakeholders; teaching facilities, the agency and the public is an edge stakeholders.Our educational interests of the athletes of stakeholder’s needs and implementation. Interests and needs of educational interests of the athletes stakeholders refers to stakeholders’ expectations in the emotional education for athletes, features, services, security, economic and other aspects, that is, education stakeholders to create value for the athletes future. Expectations for athletes’ education can be divided into two, one is specific needs. Such as athletes expect to get the opportunity to pursue advanced studies and get more jobs, a good educational environment, enhance competition, training comprehension ability. Parents expect a good educational environment, liberal education policies. Teachers’ expectations by schools and sports personnel training institution seriously, clearly the status of teachers, a healthy educational environment, a clear career vision and so on. Another is a broad expectation, as the government expects performance to improve the government’s image, healthy social environment, and promote the healthy development of sport. The interests of all stakeholders expect different, indicating its concern at different angles, there are also differences in implementation, conflict of interest and therefore it will exist between the various stakeholders in the game.The fourth part, conflicts of interests of the game athlete stakeholders. Interests and needs of the differences between each other so that the interests of the game constituted, interests of the game resulted in a conflict of interest between the individual and collective stakeholders game matrix surrounding conflicts of interests of both sides is conducive to finding the best balance maximizing strategy, but in society Best practice balancing policy is not necessarily the interests of both Strategies. Thus, long-term development goals look interests, strengthen self-construction is the maximization of stakeholder interests and needs, achieve win-win situation, efficient and effective way to integrate community resources.Stakeholder Perspective American athletes’ education management experience highlights. American Union school sports associations development exceeded a hundred years, initially in the form of inter-school competition will be spontaneous, school interscholastic athletic competition is becoming a very important part of education, but also with its institutional evolution of its history characterized by bottom-up The development gradually improved. Since the government imposed the state limited management model that effectively weakened the intervention of administrative power, so that the school league sports associations to maintain the stability autonomous governance structure, but also gives the school league sports associations more autonomy. School league sports associations as a vehicle carrying a number of interest associations, clubs, athletes, parents, coaches, schools, government, school principals and other related subjects, including the interests of Associations of common interests of stakeholders. Union to safeguard the interests of all parties, to maintain the balance of interests between stakeholders, formed the Association for the carrier to the school as an integral member of the governance structure, decision-making, legislative and personnel the right to supervise the Union are represented by the Board of Directors, the Executive The Committee, set up under the association of the organizations, joint control and management functions of the Commission, to form a reasonable balance mechanism, effectively avoid the excessive concentration of power and prevent the emergence of tangible capital and performance utilitarian result of alienation. Governance has always been around education-oriented, through sports activities to help improve student achievement, giving students the right to participate in interscholastic sports activities, establish good citizenship and healthy lifestyles as the goal, the goal of consistency the benefit of all achieve stakeholder interests and needs, and is conducive to active participation of all stakeholders. In order to form a rational allocation of resources, to protect athletes’education and healthy development, the American student sports associations to develop a scientific and strict system of rules, including competition amateurism, academic consistency, and equality admission recruit other systems, effective protection of the participation stakeholder implementation. This development pattern is typical of stakeholder collaborative governance model.China’s educational interests of the athlete’s collaborative governance stakeholders. Our athletes’ education are mainly government-led, sports department and education department condominium, school and sports personnel training institution of the cooperative manner taught by the body to govern. Governance process due to the different way of profit between interest groups continues to lead to a conflict of interest. Therefore, the establishment of educational development conducive to athletes stakeholder collaborative governance principles, establish and improve athletes’ educational development stakeholder collaborative governance structure, improve athletes’ educational development stakeholder collaborative governance system designed for Chinese athletes Cultural Education The development has a guide and learn a very important role. First, establish the right governance principles. To achieve the interests of the athletes and cultural education stakeholders’ collaborative governance, education-oriented principle must follow the principle of balanced interests, the principle of stability and development, to maximize the benefits of the principle, the principle of the right to effective protection. Second, we try to build a formation of rational collaborative governance structure. Organizational structure Stakeholder collaborative governance is based on collective stakeholders as the center core stakeholder management network by government, schools, sports personnel training institution for the ternary composition of the main interests of the collective, sports management and education authorities collaborative management, Although sports administration and education administration personnel training for sports institutions and schools were erected Association, but the management centers and associations as a mode of management difficult to achieve the separation of management, therefore, associations materialized, Association Alliance is perfect key to governance structure, according to education-oriented, and promote the comprehensive development of athletes as goal-oriented, improve competition and academic system in schools and sports personnel training institutions is fundamental. Third, form a complete collaborative design management system. Learn SF system design experience American student-athletes to form a fair sports competition system to ensure institutional amateur sports competition, establish and improve the unity of academic supervision system, the establishment of coaches at all levels of performance balance system to ensure that athletes Consistency recruitment system, establish and improve the interests of different stakeholders safeguards. Convergence of interests forms a community of interests, to ensure goal congruence stakeholders.