A Study On Promotion Of Economic Community Between South Korea And Joseon

The South Korean government had different argument and theories ofpromotion of economic community of South Korea and Joseon depending uponnature and inclination of the government, academic world and government in thepast. In the era that both South Korea and Joseon have frozen informationexchange and cooperation, discussion on promotion of economic communitybetween both was thought to be early and discussion on promotion of theeconomic community has been fallen into a chaos. The chaos thought of aneconomic community of both South Korea and Joseon not to understand aprocess that accelerated chaos. When Park Geun-hye government took power atthe moment, political check of the promotion as well as political approach fromnew point of view of the government and academic world was urgently needed:So, the study investigated relations between South Korea and Joseon to examinepromotion of economic community of both and to add values of the study at thetime of frozen relations between both.The economic community of both indicates final shape of ‘single economicregion between South Korea and Joseon, and means ‘a process of promotion ofsingle economic region’. The promotion of economic community of both SouthKorea and Joseon was thought to be a process, and the economic communitycould not be realized without economic exchange and cooperation between both.This was because economic exchange and cooperation between both waseconomic community and promotion of economic community between both couldbe a road of unification of the Korean Peninsula. This study investigatedpromotion of economic exchange and cooperation between both with a goal oflong-term economic community between South Korea and Joseon.In the era of globalization of world economy, economic community of bothSouth Korea and Joseon was thought to be very much important from point ofview of economic cooperation in North East Asia: And, economic cooperation inNorth East Asia was discussed not to produce concrete outcome so that economicexchange and cooperation between both were not made to have difference ofpolitical and economic system, historical and cultural conflicts and difference ofeconomic development stage and levels in the North East Asian region. At themoment, discussion and study on economic community of both countries wouldbe much valuable. This study adopted theoretical study preliminarily, empirical studyadditionally, historical study focused on dynamic, practical and forecasting studyin supplementary way. The theoretical and empirical study investigatedpromotion of economic community of both countries based on theory of bothstatic effect and dynamic effect of customs union, important theory of economiccommunity, and described needs, possibility, goals, strategy, methods andprograms of promotion of the economic community in theoretical, empirical andlogical way. And, the study described outcome and limitation of economicexchange and cooperation between both for promotion of economic communityand discussed theories of reformation and systems.The study investigated experience and lessons of economic exchange andcooperation last tens of years of Europe, South America, North America andother countries, and gave implications of economic exchange and cooperation ofboth countries: Final goal of the study was to examine vision of the economiccommunity of both and to give political background and concrete counteractionsthat South Korea could promote to do economic exchange and cooperation forboth countries. The study collected existing literature and material to investigateliterature at home and abroad and to examine statistical data of the NationalStatistics Service, the Ministry of Unification, the Ministry of Industry andResources and others, and investigated data and material of KOTRA, KITA, andthe Federation of Korean Industries, etc. And, the study investigated material ofChosun Ilbo and Jungang Ilbo and other South Korean daily news, and dailynews of Joseon such as Rodongsinmun, Minjujoseon and academic material inJoseon such as ‘Gyeongjeyeongu’ and ‘Journal of Kim Il-seong University’, andmade use of literature and statistical data of economic exchange and cooperationof both countries to suggest a way as well as base of South Korea’scounteractions.The study consisted of8chapters: Chapter1described research background,values of the research, research and assessment at home and abroad, contents ofthe research, research methods and contribution to the research. Chapter2thatwas general analysis upon promotion of economic community investigated values,types, needs and possibility of the economic community and discussion betweenboth countries. Chapter3investigated not only important theories of economiccommunity but also theories for South Korea and Joseon. Chapter4investigated goals and models of the economic community in various ways. Chapter5investigated promotion, trade weight and disadvantages of current economicexchange and cooperation of both countries. Chapter6investigated political,economic and cultural outcome of the economic exchange as well as actualconditions and improvements of the economic cooperation. Chapter7describedpromotion strategy of the economic community of industry, region and businesstype by stages. Chapter8gave subject and programs that both countries shouldjointly promote to develop the economic community, and described systematicprogram of the economic community and described a summary.The both countries should have consensus and share the economic communityso that they should have mutual economic exchange and cooperation system torecover stability of both countries and to have systematic supplementation at thepromotion and to have joint policies of international trade, currency and othereconomic areas based on mutual agreement and consensus. In this study, SouthKorea should help Joseon solve systematic instability with new approach toJoseon’s nuclear bomb threat to settle peace in both countries and to doeconomic exchange and cooperation and to give forecast of systematic economicdevelopment of both countries by stages in long term basis and to improveeconomic cooperation system and to alleviate regulations and simplifyadministrative procedures and to get rid of overlap and inefficient factors and setup cooperative systems between departments.Joseon should take actions of reformation and opening actively to adoptinvestment promotion policy and preference of South Korean capital and to haveregular meeting between both countries and to open the committee of economicexchange and cooperation between both countries and to admit of opening ofrepresentatives of economic cooperation and Korean people’s transaction.Not only South Korea but also Joseon should be responsible for problems ofpromotion of economic exchange and cooperation between both countries. Theproblems were originated from instable relations between both countries as wellas unstable system of Joseon. Both countries should improve and alleviateeconomic and non-economic limitations according to political judgment topromote economic exchange and cooperation and to integrate economy of bothcountries. Both countries should firstly cooperate each other to solve limitationssystematically and to do economic exchange and get stable cooperation and to complete the economic community.In this study, policy of the system for promotion of economic community ofboth countries would help new Park Geun-hye regime prepare governmentpolicy against Joseon.