Font Size: a A A

The Intuition Dialectics

Posted on:2016-02-15Degree:DoctorType:Dissertation
Country:ChinaCandidate:H T LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:1225330467481387Subject:Marxist philosophy
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Dialectics as the highest thinking model is that it can grasp the universality ofconcrete, ensure the effective practice. However, rationalism of dialectics has two hugefissures. Because the dialectic way of thinking is rational, but thinking tool is concept,which itself is abstract. Rationality is unlikely to fully restore image, overall conceptcannot grasp objects and reality, from perceptual to rational, from rational to practiceexists a not across gap, from experience to concept, from concept to act is a bluff jumps.Therefore, from perceptual to rational, from rational to practice, or, from experience toconcept, there must be a very important link, otherwise, dialectics cannot be a complete,rigorous thinking method and theoretical system. This key link is intuitive, only intuitioncan link up with perceptual and rational, rational and practice, combine experiences andconcepts, concepts and behavior, realize the concrete universality of the dialectics. Thehistory of the past practice did not put forward intuition requirements for dialectics andscientific, but experience science especially psychology has no ability to provideintuitive inner mechanism research, even today, a lot of scientific research achievementsstill stop at conjecture and assumptions. Intuition, therefore, has long been aware ofand consciously used, however, few scholars have professionally, systematically andcomprehensively studied it.This paper draws lessons from and absorbed the latest research achievements in thefield of psychology, sociology and so on, criticize and inherit the Chinese and westernphilosophy theory, further investigates the intuition, essence of intuition and dialecticsand their inner link, and the dialectical relations of intuition and rational, logical. Thispaper argues as follows,First, intuition is the logic before practice. Rational rather completes thepresupposition of the world, than establishes a stable relationship between the internaland object, its nature of fragmentation, inevitability, abstractness; modeling leads thatration cannot connect the overall, accidental, concrete, diverse reality intuition connectsconsciousness with reality. In a sense, we can say that intuition is rational after thesublation of intuitive. Intuition denies abstract concepts with symbolic schema, withdirect, overall, no default it has realized the connection of consciousness and reality, intuition itself also becomes the practice before logic.Second, dialectics is the theory of contradiction system and the way of thinking,resulting from intuition and ration. The unlimitation of world and limitation of humancaused that the “dichotomy” thinking is necessary, at the same time, the “dichotomy”thinking, in turn, caused the thinking of one-sidedness and the fragmentation of the world.Dialectics comes from inherent, inevitable contradictions of thinking; using activethinking considers the contradictions of the world. Regardless of the unity of opposites oropposite to the same, their opposites can depend on experience, but the so-called “one”,which can only rely on intuition, especially establishing the unity of opposites or oppositeto the same completely rely on intuition, the duty of ration is to demonstrate therelationship set up based on the intuition.Third, logic as a thinking rule and intuition as a thinking ability are the unity ofopposites. Logic is the tool and the standard for effective inference and proof; it ismore rules of thinking even discipline rules than objective law. All logic operation rulesare established by instinct, regardless of consciously, rational logic or involuntaryirrational logic. Logic is, we can say, the logic of intuition. Intuition also must follow therules of thinking, it is an experienced logic through rational thinking, and therefore,intuition is the intuitive logic.Fourth, the rationality and intuition are against to the same. Reason is the necessarylink of thinking, with its peculiar clarity and certainty to establish a clear, logical, rationallogic, make common rules for dialogues of thought, and make the thinking and hisdialogue, dialogue between thinking possible. At the same time, ration destroys thestructural integrity and diversity of objects, and even presupposes the reasoningconclusion ahead of schedule. Intuition is concentrated, to dismantle rationalpresupposition, directly in the face of the object itself, and builds the world ofconstruction, structural integrity and diversity in consciousness, to ensure theeffectiveness of practice.Fifth, dialectics is about intuitive logic. After Hegel’s recreation, dialectics hascompleted its theoretical form, and shows the characteristics of the rigorous rational logic.However, ration only constructs the form of dialectics, intuition provides the content ofdialectics, makes dialectic be the dialectics of concept. Intuition has direct connection with practice, and eliminate all the preset, so it has living comprehension and creativity,and presents thinking object for dialectics, and reveals the theory content, makesdialectic have rich content theory and logical thinking. Marx improved Hegel’sdialectics of the first foot inversion with category of practice, put an end to the rationalityof dialectics, thus creating a new dialectic, liberated the dialectics to the life world.Therefore, Marxist dialectics of practice, under the background of modern science,should be named as “dialectics of intuition”.Sixth, the critical nature of dialectics—Rational dialectics tortured the reality “was”with the preset “should be”, but intuition dialectical laws asked “should be” possiblewith experience “has been”. Dialectics of intuition eliminated all the preset, directlyunderstood the world, grasped the life with integrity, structural principle, therefore,intuitive dialectics more fully realized the critical nature of dialectics, looked for spiritualhome for human beings, provided development momentum.In the worship and superstition of rationalism, ration reached the height ofauthoritarian, also fully exposed its limitation and time, it won’t be able to cross the gapfrom ideas to practice. Marks transformed Hegel’s rational dialectics with the basicconcept that using practice to critic ration. With modern science, especially the theory ofmodern psychology support, we can see the modification result as the birth of thedialectics of intuition, which is Marx’s dialectics of practice’s achievements today.Dialectics of intuition is to reflect on intuition, establish the status of intuition indialectics, calling for dismantling and eliminating all the preset, directly look at ourselvesand our life world with integrity, the principle of structure.
Keywords/Search Tags:Intuition, Dialectics, Ration, Logic, Criticize
PDF Full Text Request
Related items