Transcending “The Criticism Of Capital Logic”

“The criticism of capital logic” is a hot issue in the study of Marxist theory.The contemporary capitalism presents the globalization,the domestic and foreign scholars to the research of “the criticism of capital logic” is very widespread,and “the criticism of capital logic” has gradually become a research paradigm: starting from the study of Marxist theory,it has gradually extended to many fields,it has become the explanatory discourse of different subjects such as society,politics,psychology and ecology.Such an interpretation is very popular: The logic of capital to rule the world,all problems can be attributed to capital to explain.This paper will analyze this kind of mainstream criticism of capital logic by comparing Hegel’s Logic with Marx’s Capital,and Hegel’s dialectics implied in it is the real reason for the identity of capital logic.This paper rethinks the identity of capital logic and Hegel’s dialectics,and points out the identity problem of reality and thinking of capital.The paper points out that Theodor W.Adorno’s negative dialectics and theory of non-identity form a strong criticism to reflect the identity of the logic of capital.Furthermore,it analyzes the possibility of contemporary path of non-identity to transcend “the criticism of capital logic”: Autonomist Marxism’s subject of bio-politics and Open Marxism’s concrete behavior to resist capital.The transcendental path of non-identity highlights the reflection on the single dimension of capital logic from the standpoint of historical materialism dialectics.Although the non-identity path has its own limitations,however,it is very important to point out the significance of non-identity to the mending of the labor logic and the dimension of subject.