| The tribe Cotesiini (Hymenoptera:Microgastrinae) is one of the largest groups of Braconidae, including approximately600described species of14genera. The majority of Cotesiini are endoparasitoids of larvae of Lepidoptera while a few species parasitize species of Coleoptera, Diptera and Tenthredinidae (Hymenoptera). Many species of the tribe are very important in natural control of agricultural and forest pests. The species of tribe Cotesiini from China are revised in the present work. This dissertation comprises two parts, general part and taxonomic part.The general part is mainly about taxonomic history of the subfamily Microgastrinae which includes the tribe Cotesiini. In the taxonomic part, about80species in6genera and1subgenus from China are recognized, of which37species are new to science, and1genus and14species are recorded from China for the first time.50previously known species of8genera from China with on specimens available for this study are also noted. Description of the known genus Pseudovenanides Xiao et You,2002is similar to that of the genus Deuterixys Mason,1981, while the types are not checked, so this genus is excluded from the key to genera of tribe Cotesiini from China. Information of diagonostic characters, distribution and hosts are provided for each genus, subgenus and species. Keys to genera, subgenera and species are also provided. In addition, authentically identified species deposited in the Netherlands Centre of Biodiversity Naturalis were checked to confirm the identification of some known species in this study.Types are all deposited in the Parasitic Hymenoptera Collection of Zhejiang University. A listed of the new and newly reorded taxa are as follows:New species:Cotesia carinicilla Zeng et Chen, sp. nov; Cotesia densa Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Cotesia flavistipula Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Cotesia fortis Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Cotesia hispidula Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Cotesia mediconvexa Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Cotesia mirabilis Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Cotesia polita Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Cotesia retrofossa Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Cotesia semirugosa Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Cotesia splendida Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Cotesia vesta Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Deuterixys bifossalis Zeng et Chen, sp. nov. Deuterixys curticalcar Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Diolcogaster bifurcifossa Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Diolcogaster brevivena Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Diolcogaster grammata Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Diolcogaster ineminens Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Diolcogaster laetimedia Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Diolcogaster pluriminitida Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Diolcogaster praritas Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Diolcogaster punctatiscutum Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) atrilineatus Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) cupressaceae Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) euthymarginatus Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) extensus Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) liupanshanensis Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) mediugum Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) oedipis Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) paripunctus Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) satinifulgor Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) semirugosus Zeng et Chen, sp. nov; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) tantalus Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) tumidus Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Protapanteles) validus Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.; Protapanteles (Rasivalva) angustus Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.Genus new to China:Deuterixys Mason,1981.Species new to China:Buluka achterbergi Austin,1989; Buluka noyesi Austin,1989; Buluka achterbergi Austin,1989; Buluka noyesi Austin,1989; Cotesia capucinae (Fischer,1961); Cotesia hyphantriae (Riley,1887); Cotesia kazak (Telenga,1949); Cotesia risilis (Nixon,1974); Cotesia rubripes (Haliday,1834); Cotesia tenebrosa (Wesmael,1837); Diolcogaster perniciosa (Wilkinson,1929); Protapanteles (Protapanteles) anchisiades (Nixon,1973); Protapanteles (Protapanteles) creatonoti (Viereck,1912); Protapanteles (Protapanteles) mandanis (Nixon,1965); Protapanteles (Protapanteles) popovi (Telenga,1955); Wilkinsonellus paramplus Long et van Achterberg,2003.Tribe Cotesiini Mason,1981Key to genera of tribe Cotesiini from China1. Basal half (about) of T1broadly U-sharped in cross-section; ovipositor sheath never with large, apically broadening and truncate hairs; areolet usually (95%) open (vein r-m usually absent)..................................................................................................................................2Basal half or more of T1with a longitudinal median groove, the tergite in cross-section almost V-shaped; ovipositor sheath often with1-4large, apically broadening and truncate hairs; areolet seldom (5%) open (vein r-m usually present).................................................42. Propodeum rather smooth, without carinae, ocassonally with a medial longitudinal keel; if propodeum coarsely rugose or densely, forewing with areolet closed; hairs of ovipositor sheath usually normal, but sometimes smaller than normal abdominal hairs, sometimes almost or quite invisible at50×............................................................................................3Propodeum mostly rugose, usually with a median carina and a short transverse carina running mesad from near the spiracle; areolet never closed (vein r-m always absent); hairs of ovipositor sheath normal, about the same size as hairs on terminal abdominal segment........................................................................................................Cotesia Cameron,18913. T1long, evenly narrowed posteriorly at basal half and at apical half, respectively; without excavation at basal half; rugose laterally at apical2/5, and with a shallow longitudinal notch............................................................................................Chaoa Luo et You,2004T1parellel-sided, evenly broadening or narowing posteriorly, never narrowed posteriorly at basal half and at apical half, respectively............................Protapanteles Ashmead,18984. Flagellomeres with placodes arranged irregularly, often in3or more rank; abdomen very smooth; wings with colored pattern................................Protomicroplitis Cameron,1891Flagellomeres mostly with placodes in2ranks (rarely the antennae very short and all flagellomeres with only1rank of percurrent placodes); abdomen smooth or coarsely sculptured; wings usually hyaline........................................................................................55. Areolet open (r-m absent)....................................................................................................6Areolet closed (r-m present)................................................................................................76. T1at least4X longer than wide; T2-3polished; propodeum very coarsely reticulate with3irregular carinae diverging from the apical orifice................Wilkinsonellus Mason,1981T1much less narrow; T2-3rimulose; propodeum smooth and polished with a strong median carina...............................................................................Deuterixys Mason,19817. T2and T3united into a rather uniformly rugose carapace concealing rest of abdomen; T2with no differentiaed median field................................................Buluka de Saeger,1948No such carapace present or if there is one, then T2and T3both have a triangular or other median field defined by strong grooves orT2strongly rugose.............................................. ................................................................................................Diolcogaster Ash mead,19001. Genus Buluka de Saeger,1948Key to species of the genus Buluka from China1. Posterior rim of gaster indented so that carapace hangs well over margin.......................... Buluka orientalis Chou,1985Posterior rim of gaster rarely indented, if so then carapace not over-hanging posterior margin of gaster..................................................................................................................22. T1and T2yellow, rest of gaster black; dorsomedial lobe of pronotum at least in posterior half rugose. Small species, approximately2.5mm in length; face of female narrow (mean face width:head width=1:2.57)............................................. Buluka noyesi Austin,1989T1and T2all black or partly marked with yellow; dorsomedial lobe of pronotum smooth33. Smooth area around propodeal spiracle large and reaching anteriorly to foremargin of propodeum; body and wings very dark, venation and infuscated areas of forewing in particular very deeply pigmented, infuscation virtually opaque.......................................... Buluka taiwanensis Austin,1989Smooth area around propodeal spiracle relatively small, not reaching anteriorly to foremargin of propodeum; body and wings dark, but forewing infuscation still translucent Buluka achterbergi Austin,19892. Genus Chaoa Luo et You,2004Only one species of this genus, Chaoa flavipes Luo, You et Xiao,2004, is known in China.3. Genus Cotesia Cameron,20041891Key to species of the genus Cotesia from China1. Segment13-17of antennae cubic or at most subcubic, hardly longer than wide; antennae short, usually distictly shorter than body..............................................................................2Segment13-16of antennae longer than wide, at most (16-)17th joint subcubic, antenna indistinctly shorter to longer than body..............................................................................142. Mesosoma dorso-ventrally compressed; hind tibial spurs more or less equal in length, shorter than half of hind basitarsus.......................................................................................3Mesosoma not dorso-ventrally compressed; hind tibial spurs with viarable length..............63. Mesonotum with dense punctures at least anteriorly; mesopleuron smooth and shiny except dense punctures around subtegular ridge; T1and T2with similar sculptures.......................4Mesonotum with sparse punctures; mesopleuron smooth and shiny but punctate anteriorly; T1and T2with different sculptures.....................................................................................54. Hind coxa with distinct punctures; mesonotum as wide as head; scutellar sulcus arched; junction of vein r and vein2-SR distinctly directed outwards; T2slightly longer than T3.................................................................Cotesia chiloluteelli (You, Xiong et Wang,1985)Hind coxa with strong rugose-punctures; mesonotum narrower than head; scutellar sulcus staight; junction of vein r and vein2-SR not directed outwards; T2slightly shorter than T3.........................................................................Cotesia hanshouensis (You et Xiong,1983)5. Face protruding distinctly below antennae; pronotum with shallow punctures below dorsal furrow; propodeum distinctly oblique posteriorly; vein r may as long as vein m-cu.......................................................................................................Cotesia flavipes Cameron,1891Face not so protruding below antennae; pronotum smooth and impunctate below dorsal furrow; propodeum relatively flattened; vein r shorter than vein m-cu......................................................................................................................Cotesia chilonis (Munakata,1912)6. Vein r slightly shorter than vein2-SR..................................................................................7Vein r longer than vein2-SR................................................................................................87. Hind coxa with undefined punctures or deep rugose-punctures; mesoscutum with dense strong subreticulate-punctures especially on posterior half, almost smooth on lateral1/4; T3smooth and shiny..................................................Cotesia radiantis (Wilkinson,1929)Hind coxa with dense strong punctures on flattened dorso-lateral area of outer surface; mesoscutum with dense shallow punctures, deeper posteriorly; T3polished except rugulosity at base......................................................Cotesia fortis Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.8. Propodeum without trace of medial longitudinal keel..........................................................9Propodeum at least with weak medial longitudinal keel.....................................................129. T1more or less parallel-sided............................................................................................10T1at least indistinctly broadened posteriorly.....................................................................11 10. T1fully3x as long as wide, very narrow; ovipositor sheath about1/3as long as metasoma, slender and distinctly decurved; mesonotum more or less shiny, punctures on surface reduced, more and more distinct anteriorly; scutellum impunctate...........................................................................................................................Cotesia angustibasis (Gahan,1925)T1more or less longer than the greatest width before apex; ovipositor sheath distinctly shorter than2nd segment of hind tarsus; mesoscutum dull to with satin-sheen, with dense fine punctures, almost invisible; scutellum with trace of fine puncture............................................................................................................................Cotesia pieridis (Bouche,1834)11. Vein1-R1about as long as to more or less disntinctly longer than pterostigma; mesoscutum with weak to very weak punctures from anterior to posterior but smooth just before scutellar sulcus, notauli indistinct; malar space and eyes normal............................................................................................................................Cotesia kazak (Telenga,1949)Vein1-R1shorter than pterostigma; mesonotum usually with dense to confused punctures; malar space usually long,1.2-1.5x longer than basal width of labium and eyes small in lateral view.................................................................Cotesia tenebrosa (Wesmael,1837)12. Antennae distinctly shorter than body; vein1-R1at least as long as ptrostigma; T3as most finely punctate partially.....................................................................................................13Antennae about as long as body; vein1-R1distinctly shorter than ptrostigma; T3coarsely rugose except laterally and posteriorly.....................Cotesia densa Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.13. Flagellum without erect pilosity; propodeum only with a weak medial longitudinal keel; vein1-CU1slight longer than vein2-CU1; vein r arsing from pterostigma obliquely...............................................................................Cotesia mediconvexa Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.Flagellum with erect pilosity; propodeum with a distinct and completed medial longitudinal keel; vein1-CU1shorter than vein2-CU1; vein r perpendicular to anterior margin of pterostigma........................................Cotesia hispidula Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.14. Hind coxa evenly rugose to rugulose or rugose-punctate; inner hind tibial spur not longer than outer one, both of them not longer than half of basitarsus..........................................15Hind coxa punctate or unevenly rugose or rugose-punctate (partly rugose or rugose-punctate); hind tibial spurs with viarable length.....................................................2115. Scutellum at most faintly punctate, shiny...........................................................................16 Scutellum at least on posterior half, densely punctate to rugose........................................1916. Fore apical tarsus withoutspine; T2less transverse, at most twice wider behind than long medially; inner hind tibial spur about as long as outer one................................................17Fore apical tarsus with a small spine, but not emarginated at the base; T2transverse, thrice wider behind than long medially; inner hind tibial spur shorter than outer one, rarely equal in length...............................................................................Cotesia tibialis (Curtis,1830)17. Preapical segment of antennae longer, about twice as long as wide; T3more less with sculptures; mesoscutum without medial longitudinal upheaval on posterior half..............18Preapical segment of antennae short,1.4x as long as wide; T3polished, without sculptures; mesoscutum with a smooth and shiny narrow medial longitudinal upheaval on posterior half....................................................................Cotesia carinicilla Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.18. Mesosoma narrower than head; face weakly rugose, dorsal1/3with a protruding medially; T2longtitudinally swelling medially.......................Cotesia luminata Chen et Song,2004Mesosoma as wide as head; face rugose-punctate, without protruding; T2not longtitudinally swelling medially...............................Cotesia planula Song et Chen,200419. T2less transverse, not more than2.5x longer medialy than wide behind; hypopygium less developed, not beyond apex of metasoma; T3slightly longer than T2...............................20T2strongly transverse,2.7-3.Ox longer medialy than wide behind; hypopygium highly developed, usually a little beyond apex of metasoma; scutellum with weaker sculptures, punctures weaker medially...................................Cotesia melitaearum (Wilkinson,1937)20. T1not longer than wide behind; T2more transverse,2.2-2.5x longer medially than wide behind; T3usually rugulose to uneven basally, scattered with fine seta all over; scutellum densely rugose-punctate, shiny........................................Cotesia vestalis (Haliday,1834)Tl slightly longer than wide behind; T2less transverse,1.7-2.Ox longer medially than wide behind; T3polished, with a transverse row of seta before posterior margin, rarely also with few seta laterally; scutellum with sparser punctures and interspaces polished anteriorly, rusogse to rugose-punctate posteriorly....................... Cotesia ruficrus (Haliday,1834)21. Fore apical tarsus with a spine...........................................................................................22Fore apical tarsus without spine.........................................................................................2822. Inner hind tibial spur not longer than outer one, at most slightly longer, shorter than half of basitarsus...........................................................................................................................23Inner hind tibial spur longer than outer one and not shorter than half of basitarsus...........2423. Part of ovipositor that excerted beyond hypopygium about as long as3rd segment of hind tarsi; the phragma of scutellum narrowly visible; mesoscutum with fine sculptures that comprised of fine punctures; notauli indistinct, indicated by dull sculptured band or more or less coarse punctures........................................Cotesia melanoscela (Ratzeburg,1844)Ovipositor short, not excerted beyond hypopygium; the phragma of scutellum completely hidened; mesoscutum with coarse punctures; notauli indistinct, indicated by dull sculptured band or more or less coarse punctures; course of notauli punctuate.............................................................................................................................. Cotesia schaeferi (Marsh,1979)24. T3usually polished, at most rugulose along anterior margin and medially........................25T3mostly sculptured..........................................................................................................2625. Hind coxa with large area of coarse punctures dorsally at base, and with longditudinal striae dorsally at apex, other parts with well seperated fine punctures; T3smooth in a triangular area among the base, the apex and middle of the base, other parts with fine punctures; vein1-R12.5-3.Ox as long as its distance from apex of marginal cell..........................................................................................................Cotesia spuria (Wesmael,1837)Hind coxa polished, only with sparse fine punctures on outer surface; T3rugulose and with longitudinal-arciculate sculptures, but polishe laterally and posteriorly; vein1-R1only slightly longer than its distance from apex of marginal cell....................................................................................................................................Cotesia polita Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.26. Propodeum with a indistinct or weak longitudinal keel; hind tibia with sparse thickened spines on outer surface; preapical segment of antennae long, at least twice as long as wide...........................................................................................................................................27Propodeum with a complete distinct longitudinal keel; hind tibia without thickened spines on outer surface; preapical segment of antennae short, not more than twice as long as wide....................................................................................Cotesia vesta Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.27. The transverse, posterior tangent to the anterior ocellus just touch the posterior pair; T2less transverse, only twice as wide as long medially; ovipositor sheath distinctly longer than half of hind basitarsus; head slightly broader than mesoscutum; face with a percurrent medial longitudinal upheaval.............................Cotesia splendida Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.The transverse, posterior tangent to the anterior ocellus cut the posterior pair; T2more transverse,2.7x as wide as long medially; ovipositor sheath shorter than half of hind basitarsus; head slightly narrower than mesoscutum; face with a indistinct medial longitudinal upheaval.................................... Cotesia semirugosa Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.28. Inner hind tibial spur not longer than half of basitarsus, usually not longer than outer one, at most slightly longer........................................................................................................29Inner hind tibial spur longer than half of basitarsus, usually longer than outer one, at least subequal.............................................................................................................................4329. T3completely smooth........................................................................................................30T3at least partly rugulose to rugose or punctate................................................................3830. Ocelli in a high triangular and scutellum smooth and shiny...............................................31Ocelli in a low triangular or scutellum usually more or less punctate................................3231. Hypopygium very long and large, distinctly excerted beyond apex of tergites, about as long as total length of former sternites; ovipositor sheath about as long as hind basitarsus; T1without trace of swelling medially...........................Cotesia acuminata (Reinhard,1880)Hypopygium developed, but not excerted beyond apex of tergites; ovipositor sheath about1/3as long as hind basitarsus; T1with a smooth swelling medially........................................................................................................................Cotesia simurae (You et Zhou,1989)32. Propodeum without trace of medial longitudinal keel........................................................33Propodeum at least with weak or part of medial longitudinal keel.....................................3533. Mesosoma not dorso-ventrally compressed; ovipositor sheath excerted beyong apex of hypopygium.......................................................................................................................34Mesosoma not dorso-ventrally compressed; ovipositor sheath excerted beyong apex of hypopygium................................................Cotesia chiloniponellae (You et Wang,1990)34. T2with weak swelling medially and longitudinally rugulose laterally, with distinct median field and a smooth field medially at base; T3without medial longitudinal keel; hind tibial spurs short, about equal in length, inner one hardly reach middle of basitarsus; vein1-R1as long as pterostigma; T1distinctly longer medially than wide behind.........................................................................................................................Cotesia vanessae (Reinhard,1880) T2with sparse punctures, wihtout smooth field, with sharp ridge laterally; T3with medial longitudinal keel; inner hind tibial spur as long as half of and outer one as long as1/3of, length of basitarsus,; vein1-R1longer than pterostigma; T1as long as than wide behind......................................................................................................Cotesia theae (Sonan,1942)35. Mesoscutum and scutellum at most densely punctate; ocelli in a low trangular.................36Mesoscutum and scutellum densely and deeply punctate-rugose; ocelli in a high trangular..........................................................................................Cotesia kariyai (Watanabe,1937)36. The phragma of scutellum more or less visible; no medial longitudinal keel behind ocelli; vein r slightly or distinctly longer than vein2-SR; hind coxa more or less with punctures; propodeum at least with indistinct medial longitudinal keel..............................................37The phragma of scutellum hidden; a dark-coulored medial longitudinal keel extending from ocelli to occiput; vein r about as long as vein2-SR; hind coxa smooth and shiny; propodeum rarely with medial rugae reduced, indicated by longitudinal keel...................................................................................................Cotesia alternicolor (You et Zhou,1988)37. Hypopygium short, apex truncate in lateral view; mesoscutum with regularly distributed fine punctures or finely rugulose anteriorly but polished and with satin-sheen posteriorly; T2transverse, more or less quadrate, with longitudinal sculptures, but with ill-defined lateral sulci..............................................................................Cotesia affinis (Nees,1834)Hypopygium very short, apex with a semirounded emargination medially; mesoscutum shiny with dense and distinct punctures, distance between punctures shorter or much shorter than diameter of puncture itself; T2subtriangular, with deep but indistinct lateral sulci, if with sculptured surface, it shiny, smooth laterally........................................................................................................................................Cotesia glomerata (Linnaeus,1758)38. The posterior, polished band of scutellum continueous, not interrupting at middle; hind coxa usually smooth, at most with fine punctures..............................................................39The posterior, polished band of scutellum interrupting at middle by rugose spot; hind coxa with coarse punctures dorsally at base and fine longitudinal striae at apex, with well-seperated weak punctures on outer surface..........Cotesia rubecula (Marshall,1885)39. Ovipositor sheath short,, shorter than hind basitarsus; mesoscutum with distincte punctures, not rugose or rugulose; T3usually with weak sculptures on basal1/3...............................40 Ovipositor sheath as long as hind basitarsus, tapering toward apex; mesoscutum with weak to very weak punctures, which usually confleunt so that surface of mesoscutum unevenly rugulose; T3smooth and shiny except a black rugose spot at middle.....................................................................................................................Cotesia scabricula (Reinhard,1880)40. Ovipositor sheath without erect seta; the phragma of scutellum invisible, propodeum with a medial longitudinal keel.....................................................................................................41Ovipositor sheath with erect seta; the phragma of scutellum visible, propodeum without medial longitudinal keel................................................Cotesia hyphantriae (Riley,1887)41. T2and the following tergites without longditudinal keel; vein r not longer than twice of vein2-SR; face without medial longitudinal keel..............................................................42T2and the following tergites with a longditudinal keel; vein r twcie as long as vein2-SR; face with weak medial longitudinal keel..............Cotesia dictyoplocae (Watanabe,1940)42. T1strongly reticulate-rugose apically; T3more or less rugose on basal1/3; antennae slightly shorter than body; vein r shorter than width of pterostigma.........................................................................................................................Cotesia anomidis (Watanabe,1942)T1rugose-punctate apically, usually punctate; T3with trace of weak punctures medially only at base; antennae longer than body; vein r longer than width of pterostigma.................................................................................................Cotesia taprobanae (Cameron,1897)43. T3completely smooth........................................................................................................44T3at least partly rugulose to rugose or punctate................................................................5344. T2more or less with sculptures; T1at least rugose posteriorly, if smooth and shiny and with few setigerous punctures posteriorly, then T1widest at middle and gradually narrowed toward apex........................................................................................................45T2shiny, without trace of sculptures; T1polished and shiny, only with sparse distinct punctures on apical half............................................Cotesia erionotae (Wilkinson,1928)45. Mesoscutum without notauli..............................................................................................46Mesoscutum with more or less distinct notauli..................................................................5046. Vein r not equal to vein2-SR in length..............................................................................47Vein r as long as vein2-SR................................................................................................4847. Vein r distinctly shorter than vein2-SR; basal cell with normal seta along vein M+CU1; hind coxa distinctly rugose dorsally at base; T1with dull surface, longitudinally rugose and punctuate..................................................................Cotesia cirphicola (Bhatnagar,1948)Vein r distinctly longer than vein2-SR; basal cell with long and sparse seta along vein M+CU1but with even seta all over; hind coxa with outer surface smooth to partly (or wholly) uneven, with very fine and discrete punctures; T1subshiny anteriorly, strongly rugose....................................................................................Cotesia risilis (Nixon,1974)48. Vein1-Rl as long as width of pterostigma; T2with indistinct median field, if distinct then rugose; ovipositor sheath not curved..................................................................................49Vein1-R1distinctly longer than width of pterostigma; T2with2lateral sulci extending from anterior margin to posterior margin, which narrowed medially, enclose a smooth median field, area beside it rugose; ovipositor sheath slightly downcurved.......................................................................................................Cotesia mirabilis Zeng et Chen, sp. nov.49. Mesoscutum densely reticulate-rugose, smooth before posterior margin; inner hind tibial spur slightly longer than outer one; scutellum smooth; propodeum smooth on anterior1/3, with irregular oblique carina on posterior2/3, with a complete weak medial longitudinal keel....... |
PDF Full Text Request