On Hidden Costs Of An Interview With The Rule Of Law

For many years, the right infringement is the one which academic and practice circle attaches attention to. However the backstage of it attracts little eyes. From some point of view, say the interview is a problem of practice and application rather than a new ethnical problem in the new situation. What's the possibility of the convert interview? Where the theory originated? In recent years, covert interview is a favorite form of interview for journalists, widely used in mass medium field. What kind of role this way does it play during the legalization? How to normalize this special way of interview? It is the time to convert from concentrated legal invader from assessment of legal cost. There are at least 3 majors macro problem when dealing with it sufficiently and bravely: What kind of role should Chinese media play? What is the historical responsibility of the people involved in Chinese Media? How could Chinese media administration keep update with the times?According to the article, legal respect, the convert interview originated from Freedom express. From the people's right, News freedom is its basis from civil rights is the momentum of it, from the social functions view the Public opinion is its vital task. The convert interview boom in modern China has many complicated reasons. With the news reform deepening, the conscience of the news involved, public needs and social endurance strengthened, this kind of petty visit has a good spreading effect and market. It gives the media a new trial away from the interview restriction, conforms the intentions from news mechanism. Inside includes both idealism and Realism. Make the secretive interview into the legal track, we need to devote several costs: the proportion and function which the propaganda policy play accounts in the normalized policy should be decreased; the original privileged rights and freedoms of the media workers need to be sacrificed; the efficiency will impact the news organization in one period. Increase the time and money to the news organization even hinder the normal operation or development of social economic life.As a social undertaking, ruled by law is required the participation and devotion from all walks of life. Theoretically speaking, the coin has two sides, the covert interview brings us the merits while forces people to pay some cost, sometimes even the huge sacrifice or cost. What exactly do we to pay the cost for the covert interview? What on earth does this cost? What's the relation between profit and cost? The acknowledge is still ambiguous in both academic and practice circle. In the article,during the Chinese legalization process, two kinds of cost needs to be paid to the convert interview. The dominant cost called tangible native cost, called the intangible cost. The former one refers to the tort relation, with the confliction between the private law (eg: right of reputation\ right to privacy), public law ( eg: leak the top national scale secret, and the civil right) The latter one puts the convert interview into a higher level — Test the lack of law belief under the background of legalization. The discard of law belief during the practice obviously belongs to the intangible form. It's pretty hard to adjust through the judicial methods, account by the material, instead the impact is even worse than the tangible form.Study the profound interlink between the legalization cost and the convert interview, two aspect should be found: One aspect, people estimate the benefits from it too far, overlooking the cost and sacrifice paid for that, regards it as the all good way to collect news. Then during the process of ruled by people society to ruled by law, it is possible to go backward to the ruled by people path On the other side, if all the eye just paid on the disadvantages brought by the convert interview, proposed the prohibition so as to control the spread of news conspicuous not suitable for the pragmatic situation of current Chinese society. There's no need to copy the path that "open first, restrict, prohibit at last". From the view of legal cost, the relation between benefit and cost isn't balanced. So we should apply it prudently.Since the lack of crystal clear normalization, the legal status of the convert interview is still ambiguous. We need to speed up the law of press, make the conspicuous status, consent and methods from the supervision and protection view. In this article , theoretically , \\could effect normalize the covert interview. Meanwhile, the self-discipline plays a vital play in it.