Wan School Park Scientist "q" School Gu

The people who studied Neijing(内经)historieally can be classified as twosorts—the exegetes in collation and exegetes in commentaries of medicinebooks.The former such as Duanyucai(段玉裁),Hushu(胡澎),Yuyue(俞樾),Sunyirang(孙诒让),Yuchang(于鬯),who belonged to Anhui schoolof the experts in Plain-Ology,paid their attentions to textual researeh forcontextual contents as their style of study,and the latter sueh as Wangbing(王冰),Wukun(吴昆),Zhangjiebin(张介宾),Mashi(马莳),Zhangzhicong(张志聪),who all were famous physicians,paid theirattentions to the explaining of medical principles as their style of study.Afamous professor of the conteeporary era,Qianchaochen(钱超尘),pointedout clearly that there are two schools in the exegetical history of Neijing(内经)-the collative school and the exegetic school.But up to date,in thefield of Chinese medicine,the collative school has been short of beingstudied.This dissertation mainly study the collative school,and select Suwen(素问)collative school,which is consisted of Hushu(胡澎),Yuyue(俞樾),Sunyirang(孙诒让),Yuchang(于鬯),as the object to discuss thefar-reaching influence of Plain-Ology to the study of medical documents. This dissertation is consisted of two parties,and these as following are itsmain content- First,we have looked backward into the academic origin of suwen(素问)collative school.This dissertation has sorted out a clue that the learningdeveloped from the field of Plain-Ology to the field of the medicine.WhenQian-jia Plain-Ology was at its height,the object of textual research ofAnhui-school Plain-Ology had extended from Confucian sutra to theastronomy and geography,historical institutions,medicine,agriculture,calendar,etc.Due to extending to medicine books,a system of textualresearch that belonged to Anhui-school Plain-Ology,and its contents of studyrelate to many ways of medicine,such as Neijing(内经),Shanghan(份寒),Bencao (本草) and other subjects of clinic. suwen (素问) is a sub-school ofcollation school. Second,we made a general analysis to 195 cases of collating andexegetics of Suwen (素问) made by Hushu(胡澎),Yuyue(俞樾),Sunyirang(孙诒让),Yuchang(于鬯),and compared them with the contents oftextural research of the exegetic school in the former part of the dissertation.Then,in order to open out the difference of the ways of their study betweenthe collative school and the exegetic school,we have introduced 53 typicalcases of textual research,which separately belong to five parts-distinguishing the forms,discussing the pronunciations,explaining themeanings,collation,explaining the medical principles,in the latter part ofdissertation,and introduced every case by the order-[original text][collation and exegesis of past years][textual research of Anhui school][commentary]. Third,Hushu(胡澎),Yuyue(俞樾),Sunyirang(孙诒让),Yuchang(于鬯)all are the main representatives of Anhui school.They inherited thetraditions of Duan(段)and Wang(王),and their levels were very high andtheir influences were very great.It is very significant that when they studiedthe medicine documents,they used the ways of Traditional Chinese Philology.So,this dissertation focused on these main ways of Traditional ChinesePhilology,such as the ways of Philology,Phonology and Exegetics,andbasing on the particularity of medicine documents,summed up roundly asystem of the ways of Anhui-school Plain-Ology about collating andexegetics of Suwen(素问) from five angles-the way of distinguishing theforms,the way of discussing the pronunciations,the way of explaining themeanings,the way of collation,the way of explaining the medical principles,and by comparing it with the exegetic school,made a farther summarizationto the characteristics of the collative school from such ways-the style ofstudy,the spirit of study and the way of study,etc. Fourth,there is a deba...