Research On The Difference And Performance Efficiency Of Collective Forest Main Management Models In Sanming

Forest management is the key issue in the development of sustainable ecological and social system. Collective forest tenure reform is in order to promote sustainable forest development and increase households’income with aligning the responsibility and interests of households who engaged forest management. Subsequently, a large number of forest managers and management models are emerged in southern forest regions under the context of collective forest tenure reform.Therefore, the study selected the reform typical area, Sanming city, Fujian province as study site and analyzed the difference and performance of various forest management, so as to enhance the collective forest management level and construct innovation-type forest management system in Sanming even intensify the collective forest tenure reform in China.We analyzed the change history of collective forest tenure reform, the characteristics the nature resource, social economics and forest reform policy in Sanming as well as illustrated various forest management status and characteristic; Based on the theory of institutional economics, forest management theory, the study demonstrate the difference of formation process, ownership, management, asset use, capability in shielding against risks and households characteristics of various management and the transformation mechanism. Meanwhile, using statistical analysis software SPSS17.0and the method of principal component analysis and multivariate logistic regression model, the main influence factors to household choosing various forest management model was indicated; using software of MAXDEA6.0and FRONTIER4.1, and developing the three stage date envelopment Analysis(DEA) measured the management efficiency, scale efficiency and technological efficiency of various forest management by removing the influence of external environment and random error; developing the method of analytic hierarchy process(AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, we constructed a comprehensive performance evaluation system and selected the index for evaluating forest management performance, including individual forest management, partnership forest management and joint shareholding forest manage; according to the field survey, analyze and do research on household cognition of the current policy on forest tenure reform and the proper scope for taking various forest management by employing the method of general description of statistical analysis. Overall, we put forward some suggest for deep forest right tenure reform such as improving the forest rights management institution, strengthen cooperation management gradually, amelioration cutting institution and perfecting related supporting policy. The result showed that household tented to choose individual management, followed as partnership management and joint shareholding management. Furthermore, the educational level of household, the number of family labor force, the proportion of forest income, the disperse degree of forestland, the condition of forest management and policy significantly impacted households’ intention on choosing various forest management models. Especially, the more family labor force and the better forest management condition was, households would choose management by themselves, while the policy factor was insignificant to choosing individual management.The result also illustrated that management efficiency of partnership management was the highest among three management models, which joint shareholding management followed and individual household was the lowest. In addition, environmental variables had some degree impact on the efficiency of three management models. Family annual per-capital income had a positive effect on the efficiency of individual household, while the number of family work outside and forestry financial subsidies had negative influence on the efficiency of individual household. In additional, the educational level of household was favor to the efficiency of partnership and joint shareholding management. The technological level of household was proved helpful for improving the efficiency of individual household and joint shareholding management. Our findings also showed that the three managements all had input slacks.We also found the joint shareholding management has the highest proportion in high comprehensive performance level, the partnership management has the highest proportion in middle comprehensive performance level and the in low comprehensive performance level through the AHP-Fuzzy evaluation system.