| Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of acupuncture combined with rosé foursubstance decoction and simple acupuncture release in the treatment of piriformis syndrome(PS)of blood stasis of qi stasis,to clarify the advantages of acupuncture combined with rosé four-object decoction in the treatment of piriformis syndrome,and to provide a new path for the future clinical treatm-ent of this disease.Methods:The 60 eligible PS patients were divided into treatment group and control group using the principle of randomization,with 30 cases in each group,the treatment group was treated with acupuncture release combined with rosé four-substance soup,and the control group was treated with acupuncture release alone,and the visual analogue score(VAS),0swestry dysfunction index(ODI),clinical symptoms and signs score,immediate pain relief effect evaluation,and TCM symptom evaluation were analyzed to observe whether there were statistical differences between the two groups.Results:1.Efficacy observation indicators: two groups of visual analogue score(VAS),0swestry dysfunction index(ODI),clinical symptoms and signs score,immediate pain relief effect evaluation,TCM syndrome evaluation after statistical analysis,the results are as follows:(1)VAS score: The comparison of VAS score(P>0.05)between the two groups before treatment showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups,and the two groups of patients were comparable.After treatment,the VAS scores of the two groups decreased significantly,and the VAS scores of the treatment group(P<0.05)before and after treatment and the VAS scores of the control group(P<0.05)were compared,indicating that the treatment regimens of the two groups had significant efficacy in analgesia.The comparison of VAS scores between treatment groups and control groups(P<0.05)suggested that the treatment regimen of the treatment group was better than that of the control group in terms of analgesia.(2)ODI score: The comparison of ODI score(P>0.05)between the two groups before treatment showed that there was no statistical difference between the two groups,and the two groups were comparable.After treatment,the ODI scores of the two groups decreased significantly,and the comparison of the ODI scores before and after treatment(P<0.05)and the comparison of ODI scores before and after treatment(P<0.05)in the control group indicated that the treatment regimens of the two groups had significant efficacy in the functional recovery of patients.The comparison of ODI scores between treatment groups and control groups(P<0.05)after treatment indicated that the treatment regimen of the treatment group was better than that of the control group in terms of functional recovery.(3)Clinical symptoms and signs score: The comparison of clinical symptoms and signs scores between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05)showed that there was no statistical difference between the two groups,and the two groups were comparable.After treatment,the scores of clinical symptoms and signs decreased significantly in both groups,and the scores of clinical symptoms and signs before and after treatment(P<0.05)in the treatment group and the pre-and post-treatment clinical symptoms and signs scores in the control group(P<0.05)were compared,indicating that the treatment regimens of the two groups had significant efficacy in improving clinical symptoms and signs.The comparison of clinical symptoms and signs scores between treatment groups and control groups(P<0.05)after treatment indicated that the treatment regimen of the treatment group was better than that of the control group in terms of clinical symptoms and signs.(4)Evaluation of immediate pain relief effect: In terms of immediate pain relief effect of the two groups,the immediate pain relief effect of the treatment group was 87%,and the immediate pain relief effect of the control group was 83%,and there was no significant difference between the two(P>0.05).(5)TCM syndrome assessment: The comparison of TCM syndrome scores between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05)showed that there was no statistical difference between the two groups,and the two groups were comparable.After treatment,the scores of TCM syndrome in the treatment group were significantly reduced,and the TCM syndrome scores of the treatment group(P<0.05)and the control group before and after treatment(P<0.05)were compared,indicating that the treatment regimens of the two groups had significant effects on the improvement of TCM syndrome in patients.The comparison of TCM syndrome scores between the treatment group and the control group(P<0.05)after treatment showed that the treatment regimen of the treatment group was better than that of the control group in terms of improvement of TCM symptoms.2.Clinical efficacy: the total effective rate of acupuncture release combined with rosé four-substance soup group was 97%,and the total effective rate of simple acupuncture release group was 73%,after statistical analysis,P<0.05,the difference between the two was statistically significant,indicating that acupuncture release combined with rosé four-substance soup group was better than that of simple acupuncture release group.Conclusion:1.Acupuncture release combined with rosé four-substance soup group and simple acupuncture release group in the treatment of qi stasis piriformis syndrome has significant clinical efficacy2.The acupuncture release combined with rosette four-substance soup group is better than the simple acupuncture release group in the treatment of qi stasis piriformis syndrome. |
PDF Full Text Request