| Purpose:Through clinical observation,the curative effects of Canggui acupuncture combined with warm acupuncture and conventional acupuncture on epicondylitis of the humerus were compared,and whether the treatment of ciliated acupuncture combined with warm acupuncture on epicondylitis of the humerus was superior.Methods :Sixty-four patients with humeral epicondylitis who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group.The treatment group was treated with acupuncture with acupoints and warm acupuncture,and the control group was treated with conventional acupuncture.32 cases each.Both groups were treated for 2courses.The subjects were scored on the efficacy index(Pain Visual Analog Scale,Mayo Elbow Function Rating Scale)before treatment,1 course of treatment,and 2 courses after treatment,and SPSS25 was used.0 Statistical analysis of the data collected by the software,comparing the differences in scores between the two groups and their comprehensive efficacy,and analyzing whether the treatment methods of the two groups are statistically significant.Results:1.The general information(sex,age,duration)of the two groups of patients before treatment and the VAS score and MEPS score before treatment were notstatisticallysignificant after statistical analysis(p﹥0.05),indicating that the two groups of patients arecomparable Sex.2.VAS score results(1)Treatment group: Comparison of VAS scores before treatment and 1 course of treatment,comparison of VAS scores of 1 course of treatment and 2 courses of treatment in the treatment group.After statistical analysis,(p ﹤ 0.05),with differences.Statistical significance,indicating that the two treatment courses in the treatment group reduced the pain of patients.(2)Control group: Comparison of VAS scores before treatment and 1 course of treatment,comparison of VAS scores of 1 course of treatment and 2 courses of treatment in the control group.After statistical analysis,(p ﹤ 0.05),and there were differences.Statistical significance,indicating that the two treatment sessions in the control group alleviated the patients’ pain.(3)Comparison between the two groups: Comparison of VAS scores of 1 course of treatment in the two groups,(p﹤0.05),which is of statistical significance;Comparison of VAS scores of 2 courses of treatment in the two groups,(p﹤0.05),which is unified The significance of science and calculation indicates that the treatment group method is better than the control group in reducing pain in the patients,and the treatment group has a faster effect than the control group.3.MEPS score results(1)Treatment group: comparison of MEPS scores before treatment and 1 course of treatment in the treatment group,comparison of MEPS scores of 1 course of treatment and MEPS score of 2 courses of treatment,through statistical analysis,(p﹤0.05),there were differences.Statistical significance,indicating that the two treatment courses of the treatment group improved the patient’s elbow pain,motor function and stability.(2)Control group: comparison of MEPS scores before treatment and 1 course of treatment in the control group,comparison of MEPS scores of 1 course of treatment and MEPS scores of 2 courses of treatment,through statistical analysis,(p ﹤ 0.05),there were differences Statistical significance,indicating that the two treatment courses of the treatment group improved the patient’s elbow pain,motor function and stability.(3)Comparison between the two groups: the comparison of MEPS scores of 1 course of treatment in the two groups,(p﹤ 0.05),which has statistical significance;The academic significance means that the treatment group method is better than the control group in relieving pain,improving motor function,stability,and daily activities of the elbow joint,and it is faster than the control group.4.Comprehensive curative effect evaluation:A total of 64 patients were included in the two groups.After 2 courses of treatment,the total effective rate of the treatment group was 90.63%;the total effective rate of the control group was 81.5%.The comparison of comprehensive curative effect between the two groups was statistically significant(p<0.05),indicating that the curative effect of the treatment group was better than that of the control group.Conclusion:(1)Canggui acupuncture and acupuncture combined with warm acupuncture and conventional acupuncture have clinical efficacy in treating epicondylitis of humerus.(2)Canggui acupuncture combined with warm acupuncture is superior to conventional acupuncture in reducing pain,improving elbow function and daily activities;(3)Comparing the two methods in the course of treatment,the two courses are significantly different,indicating that the turtle turtle acupuncture combined with warm acupuncture has a faster effect and more obvious effects than conventional acupuncture;(4)The comprehensive therapeutic effect of acupuncture point acupuncture combined with warm acupuncture is superior to conventional acupuncture and has good clinical safety.Therefore,the treatment of acupuncture point acupuncture combined with warm acupuncture and moxibustion is suitable for clinical application. |
PDF Full Text Request