| Objective:1.To understand the development of domestic and international "Makerspace",the forefront of hot spots,and the results of visual presentation.2.Explore the development of innovative library environment of "Makerspace".Methods:Using the popular visualization software-CiteSpace? to analysis literature from CNKI and Web of Science in recent years.It includes citation analysis,author and agency cooperative network,author co citation map,and keywords co-occurrence analysis.It combines the method of literature metrology with knowledge map knowledge to do qualitative and quantitative analysis.The method involves word frequency analysis,CO citation analysis,clustering analysis and factor analysis.Results:1.There were 342 literatures retrieved from the WOS core collection database.The total cited frequency is 820 times.The number of citing articles is 759.Average cited frequency of each item is 2.4 times.H index is 12.From the generated map,the author cited the Aharony.N citation frequency and the highest citation frequency of Bar llan Univ.The cited frequency of the authors has Rogers E and Oreilly T.The relevant keywords are: to the library type "academic library" and "public library" and "Digital Library" and "University Library";to library services--"information literacy" and "knowledge management" and "behavior";"makerspace" related to the Library--"technology","model"," knowledge ".2.In the CNKI database,440 literatures were obtained from the generated map,the authors collaborated less,and did not appear a large number of references to the literature of the author,the researchers are more dispersed.Domestic cooperation agencies are mainly concentrated in Shanghai(Shanghai Library,Shanghai Institute of Science and Technology Information),Beijing(Chinese Academy of Sciences),Wuhan(Wuhan University).The high frequency words based on keywords include: "guest space","university library","public library","library service","service innovation","librarian"," "Public space","3D printing","information services".Conclusion:1.Foreign academia has not been on the library "Makerspace" has a clear definition,has not yet formed a standardized,are relying on their own conditions to establish the characteristics of the "Makerspace".The United States not only in the library "Makerspace" academic research field leading the amount of literatures,and carried out practical exploration,there have been a number of public libraries to establish a successful case,and part of the university library has established a small " Makerspace"."Makerspace" is in the " WEB2.0 " under the exploration,and the Internet are inseparable;China has been a small amount of exploration in recent years,the number of academic papers grew slowly year by year,there have been a number of small-scale library "Makerspace".2.The exploration and construction of the "Makerspace" in our country has just started,and most of them are still in the research of theoretical nature.Some domestic public libraries have established some small "Makerspace".But the function is simple and the facilities are simple.Public library participation is low,and the university library also rarely establish the "Makerspace" success stories.However,the construction of our library "Makerspace" has an unprecedented opportunity in the country to "innovation and entrepreneurship" as the current development.And clearly written under the premise of the government report,has been the strong support of government departments.For our "maker" to provide an ideal platform,has a very good development prospects. |
PDF Full Text Request