The Discrimination On Similarities And Differences Between Brothers Cheng's Philosophy Ontology

The Song and Ming Dynasties narrowly jurisprudence is known asthe Song and Ming Dynasties, is because 'principle' is the areawithin the core areas of patterns, and how can Heaven's principlebe praised for home or core concepts. Although brothers Cheng beforeor at the same time, "heaven's principle" concept has been usedin some other philosophers. But as its central theme from thebeginning of the brothers Cheng.Brothers Cheng only to heaven'sprinciple as the highest identity and the core doctrine of theconcept. So have always believed that the brothers Cheng is thefounder of jurisprudence, is the founder of the the Song and MingDynasties' Confucianism.Brothers Cheng philosophy, jurisprudence home where theprinciple scholars do not think there is any different. In Chinesephilosophy is the history of contemporary works, often notdistinguishing between. Some Notwithstanding the distinction, butin dealing with their ideas as a thinking remains to deal with. Inpractice, however, Brothers Cheng thinking is differentiated.The distinction between philosophy and links to Brothers Chengshould grasp the distinction between internal and liaison of theSong and Ming Dynasties. This will both visit: First, from the Songand Ming Dynasties, the task of ideological and cultural. the Songand Ming Dynasties is the core jurisprudence "--changes in theworld of nature." Domestic demand in the re-establishment of themoral sense for the inherent moral point, the main internal.External demand from the perspective of a Confucian culturaltradition cultural construct. Cheng Hao jurisprudence reinforcedthe inherent requirements of the mandate and Cheng Yi jurisprudenceis the externalization of the tasks required. This is boththeoretical identity premise.Secondly, the the Song and Ming Dynasties thought as a unifiedsystem of jurisprudence, particularly the concept of integratedidentity the Song and Ming Dynasties jurisprudence, must be heart,ether, principle for the integration is. n specific culturalbuilding process, the identity of different thinkers will emphasizeparticular aspects of significance. This, in turn, constitutes atwo-way learning their lead hearts, principles respectivelydirection with the real possibility of necessity.They thought the following link: First, Cheng Hao and Cheng Yibrothers to construct identity theory. Focusing on " heaven'sprinciple " areas become home to the debate or rebuttal of the maincontent of the Song and Ming Dynasties. " Principle " the right tofound a big way, and he also make the heaven's principle for hisphilosophical identity of the core concepts. As a full-grown theprinciple scholars, the objective requirement for the appearance. Asis the reason he will not be altered by the will of peopleobjectively, there is the phenomenon of all persons under the border.Second, the brothers Cheng structure and the philosophy of thestructure is also consistent. This structure is the way to hisscholarly work at the core. As viewed from heaven being, the natureof cultivation is behind. Is the identity theory, the theory ofknowledge, cultivation of three-dimensional.Their ideological differences as follows : Cheng Hao and ChengYi have different philosophical position. Cheng Hao has thesubjectival philosophical position. He did not deny how can heavenobjectivity. But he also stressed that how can heaven's principleis understood to exist in people, and people are known as the basiclaw. Take a person through his own true feelings about theirexperience, to realize the true nature of human understanding. Thusachieving a definitive identity. The ultimate realization of thetrue nature of their hearts understanding. Cheng Hao is the maincharacter in this subbjectival position for heaven,nature, mindachieve integration. And the philosophy expressed in Cheng Haotoward confrontation, knowledge of the position. As for theobjective existence of Cheng Yi talk. He mainly talked about theissue for objectivity. The principle and the gas, the below formand the above form,and physical objects in Cheng Yi here were neatlyseparated.And below form is the masterof the above form . Second,some important concepts of jurisprudence, the understanding ofdifferent connotations. Second, some important concepts ofprinciple, the understanding of different connotations. First,they grasp the meaning of the different arguments. The principleis not that the big-external and outward. He stressed that Circle,the real concern is how to understand the mentality applies. ChengHao is not emphasize the distinction between them.His view of theWay and the nature of uniform.He thinks there is only a world wherethe below form and the above form are uniform.All of the world isthe heaven's priciple and the of the show of the heaven's priciple.He also stressed unity. Cheng Yi concern for the provision ofobjective, he reasons against objective. He attached importance tothe objective existence priciple. As a target for an objective viewof the provisions of its objective, which is something specificcharacteristics. Secondly, the below form and above form which isdifferent understanding. Cheng Yi is of special importance to thedistinction. That is ,he who is substance, imperceptible,the Way,below form and function,manifest manifest,instruments above formis usedobviously, the device, they can not be confused.Southern Song Dynasty, the jurisprudence within the principleacademic and the mind academic are two factions. They attack eachother, trying to gain the jurisprudence of the authentic successorqualifications. Therefore, subsequent to the completion of twoscholars better brothers Cheng philosophical distinctionpossibility of sexual contact-philosophy is relatively weakperformance. Differences in the basis of the whole essence ofintegration is a major task for subsequent scholars, but also wewant to complete the task. We need brothers Cheng research is theunique insights and experiences of these two carefully resolved,and then introduce them to dialogue between different insightsderived together for the establishment of reasonable integrity ofthe philosophical systems provide useful references.